UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Preliminary Proxy Statement
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 Definitive Proxy Statement
 Definitive Additional Materials
 Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

E*TRADE Financial Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 No fee required
 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
 (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:

     

 (2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies:

     

 (3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of the transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

     

 (4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:

     

 (5) 

Total fee paid:

     

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1) 

Amount previously paid:

     

 (2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

     

 (3) 

Filing party:

     

 (4) 

Date Filed:

     

 

 

 


LOGOLOGO

 

 

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Be Held May 11, 20179, 2019

 

 

TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of E*TRADE Financial Corporation (“E*TRADE,” the “Company,” “us” or “we”), which will be held in the Roman Room at The Michelangelo Hotel, 152 West 51st Street,Westin New York at Times Square, 270 West 43rd Street, 8th Floor, New York, 10019,NY 10036, on May 11, 20179, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. EDT, for the following purposes:

 

 1.

To elect twelve directors to the Board of Directors to serve until the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

 2.

To approve, by anon-binding advisory vote, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (the “Say-on-Pay“Say-on-Pay Vote”).

 

 3.To select, by a non-binding advisory vote, the frequency of the Say-on-Pay Vote.

4.To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.2019.

 

 5.4.

To act upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

The Board has fixed the close of business on March 13, 201711, 2019 as the record date for determining those stockholders entitled to receive notice of, to attend and to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Company is pleased to continue to furnish its proxy materials to its stockholders via the Internet. We believe that this process allows us to provide our stockholders with the information they need in a more timely manner, while reducing the environmental impact and lowering the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”) by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice of Internet Availability.

It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY INTERNET, PHONE OR MAIL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. If you later choose to revoke your proxy or change your vote, you may do so by following the procedures described in the attached proxy statement. Unless you have previously requested printed materials or you request a paper copy of our proxy materials in the manner specified in the Notice of Internet Availability, you will not receive a paper proxy card.

Please read the proxy materials carefully. Your vote is important and the Company appreciates your cooperation in considering and acting on the matters presented.

 

Very truly yours,
LOGO

LOGO

Rodger A. Lawson

Executive Chairman

Chair of the Board

March 29, 201726, 2019

New York, New York


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PROXY SUMMARY

  

ii

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

  

1

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  

6

5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OVERVIEW

  

11

9

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

  

16

14

PROPOSAL2 —  NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (THE “SAY-ON-PAY“SAY-ON-PAY VOTE”)

  

19

17

PROPOSAL 3 — NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO SELECT THE FREQUENCY OF THE SAY-ON-PAY VOTE

20

PROPOSAL 4 —  RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

  

21

18

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

  

23

19

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

  

24

20

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

  

26

22

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  

39

34

PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

40

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

  

46

41

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

  

46

41

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

  

46

41

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

  

46

41

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

  

48

42

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 11, 20179, 2019

  

49

43

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM10-K

  

49

43

OTHER MATTERS

  

49

43

 

i


PROXY SUMMARY

Below are highlights of the information that you will find in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement and our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 20162018, as amended, before voting.

 

20172019 ANNUAL MEETINGOF STOCKHOLDERS

 

Date and Time: Thursday, May 11, 20179, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. EDT
Place: 

The Michelangelo HotelWestin New York at Times Square

Roman Room

152270 West 51st43rd Street, 8th Floor

New York, New York 10019NY 10036

Record Date: March 13, 201711, 2019
Voting: Stockholders as of the Record Date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Admission: Photo identification and proof of ownership are required to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Please see the question “Who can attend the Annual Meeting?” on page 3 for more details.

 

MEETING AGENDAAND VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS

 

  

Board Vote

Recommendation

 

Page Reference

(for more detail)

Proposal 1 – Election of Twelve Nominees for Director ✓FOR

each nominee

 65

Proposal 2 –Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve the

 Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive

 Executive Officers (the “Say-on-Pay“Say-on-Pay Vote”)

 ✓FOR 1917

Proposal 3 – Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Select the

                     Frequency of the Say-on-Pay Vote

✓ONE YEAR20

Proposal 4 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent

 Registered Public Accounting Firm

 ✓FOR 2118

 

HOWTO CAST YOUR VOTE

Your Vote is Important

Please cast your vote, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person.

Stockholders of Record, who hold shares registered in their names, may vote:

 

 Online

On the Internet by visiting www.proxyvote.com

 

By calling1-800-690-6903 (please have your proxy card in hand)

 

By returning a signed proxy card via U.S. mail

In person at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders

The deadline for voting onlineon the Internet or by telephone is 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 10, 2017.8, 2019. If you vote by mail, your proxy card must be received no later than the day before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

ii


Street Name Holders, who own shares through a bank or brokerage firm, may vote by returning the voting instruction form, or by following the instructions for voting via telephone or the Internet, provided by their bank or broker.broker, in each case, by the deadline provided in such materials.

If you own shares in different accounts or in more than one name you may receive different voting instructions for each type of ownership. Please vote all of your shares. If you are a Stockholder of Record or a Street Name Holder who has a legal proxy to vote the shares, you may choose to vote in person at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person,

please cast your vote as soon as possible.

 

ii


DIRECTOR NOMINEES

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

The following table below provides summary information about each director nominee standing for election to the Board for aone-year term that will expire at the Company’s 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. After eleven years of service, Joseph Sclafani informed the Company on March 6, 2019 that he would not be standing forre-election at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Following Mr. Sclafani’s decision, the Board nominated Jaime Ellertson to stand for election at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

Name

 Age Director
Since
 

Principal Occupation

 Independent Committee
Memberships

Richard J. Carbone

 69 2013 Retired Financial Services Executive Yes Audit
Compensation

James P. Healy

 66 2015 Chief Executive Officer, Capra Ibex Advisors Yes Compensation
Risk Oversight

Kevin T. Kabat

 60 2016 Retired Banking Executive Yes Compensation
Governance

Frederick W. Kanner

 74 2008 Retired Corporate Lawyer Yes Audit
Compensation
Governance

James Lam

 56 2012 President, James Lam & Associates Yes Audit

Risk Oversight

Rodger A. Lawson

 70 2012 Executive Chairman of the Company No 

Shelley B. Leibowitz

 56 2014 Technology Advisor Yes Risk Oversight

Karl A. Roessner

 49 2016 Chief Executive Officer of the Company No 

Rebecca Saeger

 62 2012 Retired Marketing Executive Yes Compensation
Governance

Joseph L. Sclafani

 68 2008 Retired Banking Executive Yes Audit

Risk Oversight

Gary H. Stern

 72 2014 Retired Financial Services Regulator Yes Risk Oversight

Donna L. Weaver

 73 2003 Retired Corporate Executive Yes Audit
Governance

 Name

 

 

Age as of
    May 9, 2019    

 Director
        Since        
 

            Principal Occupation            

 

    Independent    

 

Committee

    Memberships    

 Richard J. Carbone

 71 2013 

Retired Financial Services

Executive

 

 Yes 

Audit

Compensation

 

 Robert J. Chersi

 57 2019 Financial Services Executive Yes 

Audit

Risk Oversight

 

 Jaime W. Ellertson

 61  

Chief Executive Officer,
Everbridge, Inc.

 

 Yes 

 James P. Healy

 68 2015 

Chief Executive Officer, Capra
Ibex Advisors

 

 Yes 

Compensation

Risk Oversight

 

 Kevin T. Kabat

 62 2016 Retired Banking Executive Yes 

Compensation

Governance

 

 James Lam

 58 2012 

President, James Lam &
Associates

 

 Yes 

Audit

Risk Oversight

 

 Rodger A. Lawson

 72 2012 

Retired Financial Services
Executive

 

 No 

 

 Shelley B. Leibowitz

 58 2014 President, SL Advisory Yes 

Governance

Risk Oversight

 

 Karl A. Roessner

 51 2016 

Chief Executive Officer of the
Company

 

 No 

 

 Rebecca Saeger

 64 2012 Retired Marketing Executive Yes 

Compensation

Governance

 

 Donna L. Weaver

 75 2003 

Retired Corporate Financial
Executive

 

 Yes 

Audit

Governance

 

 Joshua A. Weinreich

 59 2018 

Retired Financial Services
Executive

 

 Yes 

Compensation

Governance

 

 

iii


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

The Company is committed to good corporate governance, which we believe is important to the success of our business and in advancing stockholder interests. Highlights include:

 

✓ Annual Election of Directors

 

 

✓ Lead Independent Director

Majority Voting Policy for Election of Directors

✓ 10 out of 12 Directors are Independent

 

 

✓ Lead Independent Director

✓ Diversity Reflected in Board Composition

✓ Regular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

 

✓     Diversity Reflected in Board Composition

 

✓     Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations

✓ Independent Audit, Compensation, Governance, and Risk Oversight Committees

 

 

✓ Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations

✓ Robust Equity Ownership and Retention Policies for Executives and Directors

✓ New Directors Receive Orientation and Participate in Continuing Education on Critical Topics and Issues

 

✓ Robust Equity Ownership and Retention Policies for Executives and DirectorsExecutive Compensation Driven byPay-for-Performance Philosophy

 

 

✓ Policies Prohibiting Short Sales, Hedging and Pledging

 

✓ ExecutiveAnnual Incentive and Equity Compensation Driven by Pay-for-Award Based onPre-established Performance PhilosophyGoals

 

 

✓ Use of a Relevant Peer Group for Annual Evaluation of our Compensation Program

 

✓     Annual Incentive and Equity Compensation Award Based on Pre-established Performance Goals

 

✓     No Tax Gross-ups

✓ Recoupment Policy to Recapture Unearned Cash and Equity Incentives

 

 

✓ No Executive SERPs or Excessive Perquisites

TaxGross-ups

✓ Annual Risk Assessment Covering All Incentive Plans

 

 

✓ No Single Trigger Change-In-Control Provisions for Equity AwardsSupplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) or Excessive Perquisites

 

✓ Annual Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation

 

 

✓ No Dividends Paid on UnvestedSingle TriggerChange-In-Control Provisions for Equity Awards

 

✓ Use of Independent Compensation Consultants

 

 

✓ Risk Oversight by Full Board and Committees

✓ Independent Reporting Lines between the Committees and the Audit, Risk, and Compliance functions

 

 

✓ Board Oversight of CEO and Executive Management Succession Plans

✓     Majority Voting Policy for Election of Directors

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

The Company’s executive compensation program is overseen by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. A summary of the Compensation Committee’s philosophy on compensation and a detailed description of the Company’s executive compensation program begins on page 2622 of this Proxy Statement.

 

iv


Stockholders Should Read the Entire Proxy Statement Carefully

Prior to Returning Their Proxy Cards

PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF E*TRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

To Be Held May 11, 20179, 2019

This Proxy Statementproxy statement (this “Proxy Statement”) is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), which will be held in the Roman Room at The Michelangelo Hotel, 152 West 51st Street,Westin New York at Times Square, 270 West 43rd Street, 8th Floor, New York, 10019,NY 10036, on May 11, 20179, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. EDT, or at any adjournments or postponements thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. These materials were first sent or made available to stockholders on or about March 29, 2017.26, 2019.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

Why am I receiving these materials?

We have made these materials available to you on the Internet or, upon your request, have delivered printed versions of these materials to you by mail, in connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting to be held on Thursday, May 11, 2017,9, 2019, at 8:30 a.m. EDT, and at any postponements or adjournments thereof. You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”).Proxy Statement.

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will act upon the matters outlined in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. These include:

 

 1.

the election of directors;

 

 2.

anon-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (the “Say-on-Pay“Say-on-Pay Vote”); and

 

 3.a non-binding advisory vote to select the frequency of the Say-on-Pay Vote; and

4.the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

Once the business of the Annual Meeting is concluded, representatives from the Company and Deloitte & Touche LLP will be available to respond to questions from stockholders.

What is a proxy and how does it work?

The Board is asking for your proxy. A “proxy” is your legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own in the manner you direct. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document is also called a proxy or proxy card. By giving your proxy to the persons named as proxy holders in the proxy card accompanying this Proxy Statement, you authorize them to vote your shares of our common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), at the Annual Meeting in the manner you direct. You may vote your shares for, against or abstain for all, some or none of the director nominees and you may choose to vote your shares for, against or abstain with respect to the other matters we are submittingsubmitted to a vote of our stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

If you complete and submit your proxy in one of the manners described below, but do not specify how to vote, the proxy holders will vote your shares FOR the election of directors as described in “Proposal 1—Election of Directors”; FOR the approval of the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) as described in “Proposal2—Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (the “Say-on-Pay“Say-on-Pay Vote”)”; for the selection of ONE YEAR as the frequency of the Say-on-Pay Vote as described in “Proposal 3—Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Select the Frequency of the Say-on-Pay Vote”; and FOR the ratification of the appointment of accountants as described in “Proposal 4—3—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

How can I receive a paper or electronic copy of this Proxy Statement?

We mailed the Notice of Internet Availability to our stockholders, except those who had previously requested paper materials. The Notice of Internet Availability contains instructions on how to access and review the proxy materials and our Annual Report on Form10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 20162018, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form10-K/A (the “2016

“2018 Annual Report”) over, on the Internet. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice of Internet Availability.

Who may vote and how many votes do I have?

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 13, 201711, 2019 (the “Record Date”) may vote at the Annual Meeting. On that date, there were 274,700,705245,136,653 outstanding shares of our Common Stock.

All of the outstanding shares of Common Stock are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders of record on the Record Date will have one vote for each share of Common Stock they hold.

What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner of stock held in street name?

Stockholders of Record. If your shares are registered in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, you are a “stockholder of record” with respect to those shares and the Notice of Internet Availability or the proxy materials were sent directly to you by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

Street Name Holders. If you hold your shares in an account at a bank or broker, you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” The Notice of Internet Availability or proxy materials were forwarded to you by your bank or broker, who is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank or broker on how to vote the shares held in your account. See the voting instruction form provided by your bank or broker for instructions.

How can I vote my shares?

By Written Proxy. All stockholders of record who received a Notice of Internet Availability or the proxy materials electronically may request a proxy card at any time by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability or on the voting website (atwww.proxyvote.com). If you are a street name holder, you will receive instructions on how you may vote from your bank or broker, unless you previously enrolled in electronic delivery.

By Telephone or Internet. All stockholders of record may vote by telephone using the toll-free telephone number on the proxy card, or throughon the Internet by visitingwww.proxyvote.com before 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 10, 2017.8, 2019. The Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, allow stockholders to vote their shares and to confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded. If you would like to receive future stockholder materials electronically, please enroll after you complete your voting process onwww.proxyvote.com. Street name holders may vote by Internet or telephone if their bank or broker makes those methods available, in which case the bank or broker will provide instructions with the proxy materials.

In Person. All stockholders of record may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Street name holders may vote in person at the Annual Meeting if they have a legal proxy, as described below.

Whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting or not, we encourage you to vote by proxy as soon as possible.Please note that the Notice of Internet Availability is not a proxy card and it cannot be used to vote your shares.shares.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability or Voting Instruction Form?

You may receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability or voting instruction form depending on how you hold your shares. You will receive a Notice of Internet Availability for shares registered in your name.name, unless you previously requested paper materials. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may also receive a voting instruction form from your bank or broker asking how you want to vote. If your shares are registered differently and are in more than one account, you will receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability or voting instruction formform. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, please vote each account on the Internet or by telephone, or sign and may have to cast multiple votes.return by mail all proxy cards and voting instruction forms. We encourage you to vote all of your shares and to have all accounts registered in the same name and address whenever possible.shares.

Can I change my vote?

Stockholders of record may revoke a proxy and/or change their vote before the time of voting at the Annual Meeting by:

 

  

voting again atwww.proxyvote.com or by telephone before 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 10, 2017,8, 2019,

 

mailing a revised proxy card dated later than the prior proxy, or

notifying our Corporate Secretary in writing that you are revoking your proxy before the Annual Meeting. Our Corporate Secretary may be reached at our offices located at Ballston Tower, 671 North Glebe Road, 15th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203-2120.

notifying our Corporate Secretary in writing that you are revoking your proxy before the Annual Meeting. Our Corporate Secretary may be reached at our offices located at Ballston Tower, 671 North Glebe Road, 12th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203-2120.

To be counted, revocations submitted in a manner provided for above must be received no later than the day before the Annual Meeting. You may also revoke your proxy by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

Street name holders may revoke a proxy and/or change their vote before the time of voting at the Annual Meeting by:

 

submitting new voting instructions in the manner provided by your bank or broker, or

 

contacting your bank or broker to request a legal proxy in order to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting.

Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

Only stockholders of record and street name holders as of the Record Date, or their duly appointed proxies, and guests of the Company may attend the Annual Meeting.

Stockholders of Record. Please bring photo identification and proof of share ownership with you to the Annual Meeting. For example, the Notice of Internet Availability received in connection with this meeting is acceptable proof of share ownership.

Street Name Holders. Please bring photo identification and proof of share ownership with you to enter the Annual Meeting. For example, a bank or brokerage account statement showing that you owned Common Stock in the Company on the Record Date is acceptable as proof of share ownership. You may not, however, vote your shares at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from your bank or broker. A legal proxy is a bank’s or broker’s authorization for you to vote the shares it holds in its name on your behalf. To obtain a legal proxy, please contact your bank or broker for further information.

What constitutes a quorum for the Annual Meeting?

A quorum is necessary to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. A quorum requires the presence of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote, in person or represented by proxy. Your shares will be counted toward the quorum requirement if you have voted by proxy.

Abstentions and brokernon-votes count as “shares present” at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum. A brokernon-vote occurs when a bank, broker or other nominee who holds shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular item because the nominee does not have discretionary voting authority to vote on that item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares.

If a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting will be adjourned until a quorum is obtained.

How many votes are needed to approve each of the proposals and what are the effects of such votes?

For “Proposal 1—Election of Directors,” directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast. “Votes cast” excludes both abstentionsAbstentions and “broker non-votes”brokernon-votes (described above). will have no impact, as they are not counted as votes cast. In an uncontested election, such as this year’s election, any director nominee currently serving as a director who receives an equal or greater number of votes “against” as compared to votes “for” must tender his or her resignation to the Governance Committee of the Board. The Governance Committee is required to make recommendations to the Board with respect to any such tendered resignation. The Board will act on the tendered resignation within 90 days from the certification of the stockholder vote and will publicly disclose its decision, including its rationale. Please see “Majority Voting Standard and Director Resignation Policy” on page 1512 for further details.

For “Proposal2—Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (the “Say-on-Pay“Say-on-Pay Vote”),” the outcome of the vote will not be binding on the Board or the Compensation Committee. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee, in the exercise of their fiduciary duties, will consider the outcome of the advisory vote in determining future compensation decisions. An affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast will be considered approval by our stockholders of the compensation of our NEOs. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no impact, as they are not counted as votes cast, on Proposal 2.

For “Proposal 3—Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Select the Frequency of the Say-on-Pay Vote,” the outcome of the vote will not be binding on the Board. However, the Board, in the exercise of its fiduciary duties, will consider the outcome of the advisory vote in determining how frequently we will seek stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs. The option that receives the greatest number of votes—every one, two or three years—will be considered the frequency approved by our stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no impact, as they are not counted as votes cast, on Proposal 3.

For “Proposal 4—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” an affirmative vote of the majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the item will be considered ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against Proposal 4.3.

If you are a street name holder and you do not instruct the bank or broker on how to vote your shares, your bank or broker may exercise its discretionary authority to vote your shares with regard to Proposal 4,3, but cannot exercise its discretionary authority to vote your shares regarding Proposals 1 2 and 3,2, thus resulting in “brokernon-votes.”

Who pays for the solicitation of proxies?

The Company pays the cost of soliciting proxies. We retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated to advise the Company and assist with our solicitation of proxies for an estimated fee of $17,500 plus reasonableout-of-pocket expenses. We will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonableout-of-pocket expenses for sending soliciting materials to beneficial owners and obtaining their votes.

In addition, toour employees, without additional compensation, may assist with our solicitation of proxies either personally or by mail, proxies may be solicited personally, by telephone or electronic media by our employees.media.

What if only one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability or proxy materials was delivered to multiple stockholders who share a single address?

Under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, a single Notice of Internet Availability (or one copy of this Proxy Statement and the accompanying 20162018 Annual Report, for those stockholders who previously requested paper copies) will be delivered in one envelope to multiple stockholders having the same last name and address and to individuals with more than one account registered at American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC with the same address unless contrary instructions have been received from an affected stockholder. This procedure, referred to as “householding,” reduces the volume of duplicate materials that stockholders receive and reduces mailing expenses.

You may revoke your consent to future householding mailings or enroll in householding by submitting a written request to our Corporate Secretary at the Company’s offices located at Ballston Tower, 671 North Glebe Road, 12th15th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203-2120. You may also send an email to ir@etrade.com or call us at(646) 521-4340.

We will promptly deliver, upon verbal or written request, a separate copy of all documentsthe Notice of Internet Availability and other proxy materials to an individualany stockholder who sharesresiding at an address with another stockholder upon request to the address, email or telephone number provided above even ifwhich only a single copy of the documents was originally delivered. Requests for additional copies should be directed to our Corporate Secretary as described above.

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Listed below are the Company’s twelve directors,nominees standing for election at this Annual Meeting, each of whom has been nominated by the Board for election by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting and has agreed to be named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. Under the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, each of the twelve nominees standing for election at this Annual Meeting would, if elected, serve for a term beginning on the date of election and ending at the Company’s 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal.

In the absence of contrary instructions, the proxy holders intend to vote all proxies received by them FOR the nominees for director listed below. Although we know of no reason why any of the nominees would not be able to serve, if any nominee is unavailable for election, the proxy holders intend to vote your Common Stock for any substitute nominee proposed by the Board.

Qualifications of Directors

The Board, acting through its Governance Committee, is responsible for recommending to the stockholders a group of nominees that, taken together, have a significant breadth and diversity of relevant experience, professional expertise, knowledge and abilities to carry out the Board’s responsibilities. Our Governance Committee Charter requires the Governance Committee to periodically review the composition of the Board and its committees in light of the risks, current challenges and needs of the Company and determine whether to add or remove individuals after considering issues of knowledge, expertise, judgment, term of service, age, skills, diversity of background and experience and relationships with various constituencies.

In presenting this year’s nominees, the Governance Committee considered, among other things, the experience the nomineesdirectors standing for re-election gained in enhancing their oversight over management in light of the heightened standards from the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ regulators, their ability to work as a collegial group during a period of transitionincreased competitive pressures and theirthe nominees’ willingness to spend the time necessary to perform their duties despite other professional commitments.

In addition to the characteristics common to all of our directors,nominees, which include expertise within the financial services industry, integrity, a strong professional reputation and a record of achievement in senior executive capacities, the Governance Committee has includedrecommended for inclusion on the Board persons with diverse backgrounds and skills reflecting the needs of the Company.

In evaluating each nominee for service on the Board, the Governance Committee considered the following specific experience and skills of the current Board:nominees:

 

Experience in a broad range of occupations and industries, which provides differinga diversity of viewpoints and expertise relating to execution of the Company’s business plans, including the banking, brokerage and financial services industry which is common to all our directors,nominees, technology and digital media (Messrs. Ellertson, Healy, Lam, Lawson and LawsonRoessner and Mses. Leibowitz, Saeger and Weaver), cybersecurity (Ms.(Messrs. Ellertson and Lam and Ms. Leibowitz), marketing and consumer retail (Mr.(Messrs. Ellertson and Lawson and Mses. Saeger and Weaver), and legal (Messrs. Kanner and(Mr. Roessner) and enterprise risk management (Messrs. Healy, Lam, Lawson and Stern); and

 

Significant substantive experience in areas applicable to service on the Board and its committees, including corporate financial management, auditing and accounting (Messrs. Carbone, Chersi, Healy, Kabat, Lawson and SclafaniWeinreich and Ms. Weaver), credit and risk management (Messrs. Chersi, Healy, Kabat, Lam, Lawson, Roessner and Stern)Weinreich and Ms. Leibowitz), regulated financial services (Messrs. Carbone, Chersi, Healy, Kabat, Lam, Lawson, Roessner and Roessner,Weinreich and Mses. Leibowitz and Saeger and Mr. Sclafani)Saeger), bank regulation (Messrs. Chersi, Ellertson, Kabat, Roessner and Stern)Weinreich) and corporate governance (Messrs. Kanner,Chersi, Ellertson, Kabat, Lam, Lawson, Roessner and RoessnerWeinreich and Ms. Weaver).

Nominees to the Board of Directors:

 

Name

 

Principal Occupation

  Director
Since
  Age as of
  May 11, 2017  
 

Principal Occupation

 

Director

Since

 

Age as of

May 9, 2019

Richard J. Carbone

  Retired Financial Services Executive  2013  69 

 

Retired Financial Services Executive

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

71

 

Robert J. Chersi

 

 

Financial Services Executive

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

57

 

Jaime W. Ellertson

 

 

Chief Executive Officer, Everbridge, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

61

 

James P. Healy

  Chief Executive Officer, Capra Ibex Advisors  2015  66 

 

Chief Executive Officer, Capra Ibex Advisors

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

68

 

Kevin T. Kabat

  Retired Banking Executive  2016  60 

 

Retired Banking Executive

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

62

 

Frederick W. Kanner

  Retired Corporate Lawyer  2008  74

James Lam

  President, James Lam & Associates  2012  56 

 

President, James Lam & Associates

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

58

 

Rodger A. Lawson

  Executive Chairman of the Company  2012  70 

 

Retired Financial Services Executive

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

72

 

Shelley B. Leibowitz

  Technology Advisor  2014  56 

 

President, SL Advisory

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

58

 

Karl A. Roessner

  Chief Executive Officer of the Company  2016  49 

 

Chief Executive Officer of the Company

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

51

 

Rebecca Saeger

  Retired Marketing Executive  2012  62 

 

Retired Marketing Executive

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

64

 

Joseph L. Sclafani

  Retired Banking Executive  2008  68

Gary H. Stern

  Retired Financial Services Regulator  2014  72

Donna L. Weaver

  Retired Corporate Executive  2003  73 

 

Retired Corporate Financial Executive

 

 

 

2003

 

 

 

75

 

Joshua A. Weinreich

 

 

Retired Financial Services Executive

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

59

 

Richard J. Carbonehas been a director of the Company since August 2013. Mr. Carbone was formerly Chief Financial Officer of Prudential Financial, Inc. from 1997 through 2013, and served as Executive Vice President until retiring from that position in February 2014. Mr. Carbone brings nearly four decades of experience in financial services, having held senior finance office positions in both the banking and securities industries, including Managing Director and Controller of Salomon Brothers and Senior Vice President and Controller of Bankers Trust Company. He began his career at Price Waterhouse & Co. Mr. Carbone received an M.B.A. from St. John’s University and is a Certified Public Accountant. He was an officer in the United States Marine Corps from 1969 to 1972. Mr. Carbone is Chair of the board of directors of Talcott Resolutions, a privately held company, a member of the board of directors for Resolution Life Holdings and its indirect subsidiary, Lincoln Benefit Life.Life, and an advisor to Hudson Structured Capital Management. He is also a director on the boardtrustee of a non-profit organization focused on helping disabled adults and indigent children.Catholic Charities of Staten Island. Mr. Carbone is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board and a member and the Chair of the Audit Committee, where he is designated an audit committee financial expert, and a member of the Compensation Committee.

Robert J. Chersihas been a director of the Company since January 2019. A seasoned financial and risk expert with 30 years of experience, Mr. Chersi held several senior executive positions in the asset management industry, including Chief Financial Officer of Financial Services at Fidelity Investments, and Chief Financial Officer of US Wealth Management at UBS. Mr. Chersi currently serves as the Lead Independent Director of BrightSphere Investment Group, as well as Chair of the audit committee and member of the nominating & corporate governance, and compensation committees. He is a member of the Board of Trustees and Chair of the audit committee for Thrivent Mutual Funds. In addition, Mr. Chersi serves on the Advisory Board of Pace University where he also serves as the Executive Director of the Center for Global Governance, Reporting, and Regulation at the Lubin School of Business. Mr. Chersi also acts in an advisory capacity to financial services industry clients as an individual as well as through Chersi Services LLC, which he founded in 2014 and is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors. Mr. Chersi holds a BBA in accounting from Pace University and is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Chersi is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board, the Audit Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee.

Jaime W. Ellertsonhas served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Everbridge, Inc. since 2011, which provides critical communications and enterprise safety solutions, where he oversees the company’s strategic vision and corporate growth. Prior to its acquisition by Everbridge, Mr. Ellertson was the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, andco-founder of CloudFloor Corporation, which focuses on the emerging enterprise cloud computing market. Prior to CloudFloor, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Gomez Inc., an Internet Performance Management provider. Mr. Ellertson has also served as Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director of S1 Corporation, an early pioneer in the online banking space, as well as founding several high growth software companies, including Document Automation Corporation, Openware Technologies and Purview Technologies Inc. Mr. Ellertson has previously served as Chairman of the Board of hVivo plc, Peoplefluent Inc., Gomez Inc., S1 Corporation, Danka Office Imaging Company, and Interleaf Corporation.

James P. Healyhas been a director of the Company since January 2015. He had a25-year career in the Investment Banking arm of the Credit Suisse Group, where he served as Global Head of the Fixed Income Division from 2003 to 2007.

Other leadership positions while at Credit Suisse included Global Head of the Emerging Markets Group, and the GlobalCo-Head of Credit Suisse Financial Products, which housed the firm’s derivative businesses. Prior to joining Credit Suisse, Mr. Healy was as an economist at the International Monetary Fund, served as a consultant to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and served as a visiting scholar at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. He is currently the CEOChief Executive Officer of Capra Ibex Advisors, a registered investment advisor he founded in 2010 to provide investment and risk management advice to select financial institutions, including First Republic Bank and JPMorgan Chase & Co.Chase. Mr. Healy is a member of the board of directors of Student Sponsor Partners, a New York City philanthropy serving 1,400 disadvantaged high school students, and served as its Board Chair from 2010 to 2014. He holds a B.A. in Economics from Stanford University, a M.Sc. in Economics from the London School of Economics, and a Ph.D. in Economics from Princeton University. Mr. Healy is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board, the Risk Oversight Committee and the Compensation Committee.

Kevin T. Kabathas been Lead Independent Director of the Company since September 2016 and a director since June 2016. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Fifth Third Bancorp from 2007 to 2015, where he was responsible for overseeing the strategic direction of the company. Mr. Kabat also served as President of Fifth Third Bancorp from 2006 to 2012, Chairman from 2008 to 2010, and Vice Chairman from 2012 to 2016. Prior to these roles, Mr. Kabat served as Executive Vice President where he led both retail and affiliate banking. Prior to joining Fifth Third Bancorp, Mr. Kabat spent 20 years at Old Kent Bank (acquired by Fifth Third Bancorp in 2001), where he served as Vice Chairman and President. Mr. Kabat is Lead Director andcurrently serves as Chairman electof the board of directors of Unum Group and a memberas Vice Chairman of the board of directors of NiSource Inc. Mr. Kabat also serves on the Cincinnati Business Committee and the Executive Committee of the ArtsWave Board of Trustees., where he has served as a director since 2015. He also served as co-chairman of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center’s “Change the Outcome” campaign and was chair of the United Way of Greater Cincinnati’s 100th anniversary campaign. He holds a B.A. in Behavioral Science from Johns Hopkins University and an M.S. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from Purdue University. Mr. Kabat is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board, the Compensation Committee the Governance Committee and is an ex officio member of the Audit Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee.

FrederickW.Kannerhas been a director of the Company since April 2008. Mr. Kanner is a retired corporate lawyer who advised corporations, boards of directors, and financial advisors in connection with merger and acquisition transactions, financings, and securities law issues, as well as matters of fiduciary duty and corporate governance. During his over 40-year legal career, he served as a partner and Of Counsel at Dewey Ballantine LLP (subsequently, Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP) where he was Chairman of Dewey’s Corporate Finance practice for more than 15 years and a member of its Management Committee for 20 years. Thereafter, Mr. Kanner served as Senior Of Counsel at Covington & Burling LLP. Mr. Kanner is a member of the board of directors of Financial Guaranty Insurance Company (where he serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee) and is a member of the board of trustees of The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. He received a B.A. in Economics from the University of Virginia and a J.D. from the Georgetown University Law Center. Mr. Kanner is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board and a member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Governance Committee.

James Lamhas been a director of the Company since November 2012. Mr. Lam has been President of James Lam & Associates, a consulting firm focused on corporate governance and risk management, since January 2002. He previously served as Founder and President of ERisk, Partner at Oliver Wyman, Chief Risk Officer of Fidelity Investments and Chief Risk Officerother executive risk and financial roles. Mr. Lam also currently serves as an independent director of GE Capital Markets Services, Inc.RiskLens. He is the author of the best-selling book,books,Enterprise Risk Management(Wiley, (Wiley, 2nd Edition, 2014) andImplementing Enterprise Risk Management (Wiley, 2017). He was named to the NACD Directorship 100,Directors & Boards “Directors to Watch,”Treasury & Risk “100 Most Influential People in Finance” three times, and GARP inaugural “Risk Manager of the Year.” Mr. Lam graduated with a B.B.A. from Baruch College in 1983 and received an M.B.A. with honors from UCLA in 1989. In 2004, he was appointed Senior ResearchHe is an NACD Board Leadership Fellow at Peking University. Mr. Lam has taught M.B.A. classes at Babson College and is certified by the Hult International Business School. He has also guest lectured at Harvard Business School.Software Engineering Institute of Carnegie Mellon in Cybersecurity Oversight. Previously, Mr. Lam served as Vice Chairman on the board of directors of ERisk and as an independent director of Covarity. Mr. Lam is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board, a member and Chair of the Risk Oversight Committee and a member of the Audit Committee.

Rodger A. Lawsonhas been Executive Chairman of the Company since September 2016 and has served as a director of the Company since February 2012.2012, and as Chair of the Board since May 2013. Mr. Lawson also served as the Company’s non-executiveExecutive Chairman from May 2013 to September 2016 to December 2018, and as Lead Independent Director from August 2012 to January 2013. Mr. Lawson is an experienced financial services executive who most recently served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Fidelity Investments—FinancialInvestments-Financial Services from 2007 through 2010. Prior to joining Fidelity, Mr. Lawson served in several senior executive roles with Prudential Financial including Vice Chairman. He has held numerous other executive positions in financial services, including President and Chief Executive Officer of Van Eck Global, and Chief Executive Officer and Partner of Global Private Banking at Bankers Trust Company. Previously, Mr. Lawson was President and Chief Executive Officer of Fidelity Investments Retail Group and Chief Executive Officer of the Dreyfus Service Corporation. Mr. Lawson earned a B.A. from London University and a M.Sc. from Bradford University. He is currentlyserved on the board of directors of UnitedHealth Group, Inc. from February 2011 to June 2018. Mr. Lawson is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board.

Shelley B. Leibowitzhas been a director of the Company since December 2014. Ms. Leibowitz is President of SL Advisory, a firm she founded in 2016 that focuses on technology strategy, IT portfolio and risk management, and cybersecurity governance. From 2009 through 2012, Ms. Leibowitz served as Group Chief Information Officer for the World Bank, Group, where she was responsible for the technology services and capabilities that underlie the work of delivering quality knowledge and financing products to the Bank Group’s clients across the globe. Ms. Leibowitz managed the Bank Group’s cybersecurity program and served as a member of the Bank Group’s Pension Investment Committee. Previously, Ms. Leibowitz held Chief Information Officer positions at Morgan Stanley, Greenwich Capital Markets and Barclays Capital, andCapital. Ms. Leibowitz also served as a board member and technology advisor for GAIN Capital. Ms. Leibowitz is an advisor tocurrently on the board of directors of security intelligence firm Endgame, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.Relations and on the board of directors of AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (where she serves on the Audit Committee). She graduated Phi Beta Kappa from

Williams College with a B.A. in Mathematics. Ms. Leibowitz is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board and a member of the Governance Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee.

Karl A. Roessneris Chief Executive Officer has been a director of the Company and has served as a directorthe Chief Executive Officer since September 2016. As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Roessner sets the vision and strategic direction for the Company. Prior to his appointment as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Roessner served as the Company’sExecutive Vice President and General Counsel for the Company for more than seven years, overseeing all compliance and regulatory functions for the Company and its bank and brokerage subsidiaries. During that time, he also served as the Corporate Secretary to the Company’s Board of Directors. Prior to joining the Company hein 2009, Mr. Roessner was a partner in the Corporate Practice group of Clifford Chance US LLP.LLP, one of the world’s leading law firms. There, he advised clients on negotiated public and private transactions, management and leveraged buyouts, capital raising activities, and corporate governance matters. Mr. Roessner earned his B.A. cum laude from Siena College and his J.D. cum laude from St. JohnsJohn’s University School of Law, where he was a member of the St. John’s University Law Review. Mr. RoessnerHe is President of E*TRADE Bank and a member of the E*TRADE Bank board.

RebeccaSaegerhas been a director of the Company since February 2012. Ms. Saeger served as Executive Vice President at Charles Schwab from 2004 through 2010, most recently as Chief Marketing Officer. Prior to joining Charles Schwab, she was Executive Vice President, Marketing at Visa U.S.A. Previously, Ms. Saeger was Senior Vice President and head of Account Management at Foote, Cone & Belding and Senior Vice President at Ogilvy & Mather. She hasMs. Saeger currently serves on the board of directors of identity management software company Okta Inc. and previously served on the board of directors as Chair of the Association of National Advertisers (ANA). She received a B.A. from Muhlenberg College and an M.B.A. from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Ms. Saeger is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board, a member and Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Governance Committee.

Joseph L. Sclafanihas been a director of the Company since June 2008. Mr. Sclafani was formerly Executive Vice President and Controller of JPMorgan Chase & Co., responsible for corporate financial operations, regulatory reporting, financial accounting and reporting and accounting policies until December 2006. His 38 years of experience include 27 years at JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its predecessors. Mr. Sclafani also spent 11 years at KPMG as a certified public accountant. He earned a B.A. from St. Francis College in Brooklyn and completed post-graduate studies in finance at Bernard M. Baruch College. Mr. Sclafani is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board, a member and the Chair of the Audit Committee, where he is designated an audit committee financial expert, and a member of the Risk Oversight Committee.

Gary H. Sternhas been a director of the Company since June 2014. Mr. Stern was President and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis from 1985 through 2009, the longest-serving president in the Bank’s history. He joined the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis in 1982 as senior vice president and director of research. His prior experience included seven years at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Mr. Stern co-authoredToo Big to Fail: The Hazards of Bank Bailouts, published by The Brookings Institution (2004). He holds an A.B. in Economics from Washington University in St. Louis, and an M.A. and Ph.D. in Economics from Rice University. He served on the board of directors of The Dolan Company from 2010 to 2014. He also currently serves on the board of directors of Standard and Poor’s Ratings, the FDIC Systemic Resolution Advisory Committee, the Ambac Assurance Corporation, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, the National Council on Economic Education, and Hamline University. Mr. Stern is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board and a member of the Risk Oversight Committee.

Donna L. Weaverhas been a director of the Company since April 2003. Ms. Weaver is a retired corporate financial executive and business owner. A Certified Management Accountant, Ms. Weaver received a B.S. in Economics and Finance from the University of Arizona and an M.S. in Management from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. Since 1986, Ms. Weaver has served on the boards of several public and private companies. Ms. Weaver is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board, a member and Chair of the Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee.

Joshua A. Weinreichhas been a director of the Company since August 2018. Mr. Weinreich is a career finance executive with extensive experience, including previously serving in a number of senior roles at Deutsche Bank, including Global Head of Hedge Funds and Chief Executive Officer of Deutsche Asset Management Americas. Prior to these roles, Mr. Weinreich held several senior positions at Bankers Trust, including Chief Investment Officer andCo-Head of Bankers Trust Private Bank. He currently serves as Chairman of the board for Leeds West Investment Group. He is also the current Chairman of the Community FoodBank of New Jersey board, Trustee and Chief Investment Officer of the Overlook Foundation, and a member of the Summit, New Jersey Board of Education. Mr. Weinreich served as an independent director for Skybridge Multi-Adviser Hedge Fund Portfolios LLC until December 2018. He also previously served on the board of directors of Alliance Bernstein, as a member of the Newark Academy Board of Trustees, and as a member of the Cornell University Endowment Hedge Fund Subcommittee. Mr. Weinreich holds a BA in Economics from Cornell University and an MBA in Finance from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Weinreich is a member of the E*TRADE Bank board and a member of the Compensation Committee and the Governance Committee.

The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR the election of each of the nominees

as directors listed above.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OVERVIEW

The Board held a total of 1912 meetings during 2016.2018. Each current director attended at least 75% of the total number of the meetings of the Board and the committees of the Board, held during his or her tenure, of which he or she was a member. Ournon-management directors met in executive session without management at least quarterly. The Chairman of the Board led theseThese executive sessions during 2016 until he was appointed as the Executive Chairman, effective September 12, 2016. Thereafter, the executive sessions have beenwere led by theour Lead Independent Director.

To conduct its business, the Board maintains four standing committees: Audit, Compensation, Governance and Risk Oversight. The primary responsibilities of each committee are set forth below:

 

Audit Committee

  

Oversees and monitors the Company’s financial reporting processes and internal control system regarding finance and accounting, and provides an open avenue of communication among the independent auditor, financial and senior management and the Board. This Committee also monitors and oversees the performance of the Company’s Chief Audit Executive and the internal audit function, and the qualifications, independence and performance of the Company’s independent auditor.auditor, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

 

Compensation Committee

  

Reviews and approves senior executive

Oversees the Company’s compensation and with respect to the Chief Executive Officer’sbenefits philosophy and the Executive Chairman’s compensation, recommends their compensation to the independent members of the Board; and oversees administration of our benefit plans, including our equity incentive plans. This Committee reviews and approves senior executive compensation and, with respect to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Chairman, if any, recommends their compensation to the independent members of the Board. This Committee also reviews the performance of the Executive Chairman, if any, the Chief Executive Officer and the members of the Company’s senior management team at least annually. As discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” this Committee retains an outside independent consultant.

 

Governance Committee

  

Oversees the Board’s and its committees’ governance practices. This Committee also leads any search for new Board members; reviews and approves the structure and philosophy of Director compensation with assistance from an outside independent consultant; recommends committee and chair assignments; and develops, recommends and oversees compliance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Company’s Code of Professional Conduct. The Committee also evaluates Board, committee and Director performance and leads the Company’s management succession planning activities.

 

Risk Oversight Committee

  

Identifies, assesses and oversees

Oversees the Company’s key risks.enterprise risk management program. This Committee monitors the risk profile of the Company; oversees the financial risk and return for the Company; supervises compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; assists the Board and the Company’s senior management in overseeing the effective financial management of the Company and its subsidiaries; evaluates the Company’s strategic planning, including reviewing material strategic transactions and potential material investments by the Company in, or in the Company by, third parties; and monitors and oversees the qualifications, performance and compensation of the Company’s Chief Risk Officer and Chief Compliance Officer.

 

During 2018 the Board maintained two advisory working groups, the Growth Initiative Advisory Working Group and the Integration Advisory Working Group, which provided advice and counsel to management on their respective topic.

Each of these committees is composed entirely of directors that meet the applicable independence requirements of the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”). Additionally, each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements for audit committee members set forth in Rule10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), and each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as a“non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule16b-3 under the Exchange Act and as an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

The charters of each of these committees are available on the Investor Relations section of our website atabout.etrade.com in thesub-section titled “Corporate Governance” section.Governance.” You may also request a copy of each of these documents free of charge by writing to E*TRADE Financial Corporation, Ballston Tower, 671 North Glebe Road, 12th15th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203-2120, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

The following table presents, as of March 29, 2017,26, 2019, the members of each committee of the Board and the number of times each committee met during 2016:2018:

 

  Director

  Name

 

 

Board

 

 

Audit
Committee

 

 

Compensation
Committee

 

 

Governance
Committee

 

 

Risk Oversight
Committee

 

  Richard J. Carbone

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

  Robert J. Chersi

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

LOGO

 

   

 

LOGO

 

  James P. Healy

 

 

LOGO

 

  

 

LOGO

 

  

 

LOGO

 

  Kevin T. KabatI

 

 

LOGO

 

  

 

LOGO

 

 

 

LOGO

 

 

  James Lam

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

LOGO

 

   

 

LOGO

 

 

  Rodger A. Lawson«

 

 

LOGO

 

    

  Shelley B. Leibowitz

 

 

LOGO

 

   

 

LOGO

 

 

 

 

LOGO

 

 

  Karl A. Roessner

 

 

LOGO

 

    

  Rebecca Saeger

 

 

LOGO

 

  

 

LOGO

 

 

 

 

LOGO

 

 

  Joseph L. Sclafani(1)

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

LOGO

 

   

 

LOGO

 

  Donna L. Weaver

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

 

LOGO

 

 

  Joshua A. Weinreich

 

 

LOGO

 

  

 

LOGO

 

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

  Number of Meetings

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

6

 

(1) Mr. Sclafani is not standing forre-election at the Annual Meeting.

 

«Chair of the BoardI   Lead Independent DirectorLOGO   ChairLOGO   Member

LOGOMr. Healy and Mses. Saeger (Chair) and Weaver are also members of the Growth Initiative Advisory Working Group and Messrs. Kabat (Chair) and Lam and Ms. Leibowitz were also members of the Integration Advisory Working Group.

Communications to the Board, the Executive ChairmanChair of the Board, thenon-management directors or any other director may be sent to: E*TRADE Financial Corporation, Ballston Tower, 671 North Glebe Road, 12th15th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203-2120, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The Company does not have a formal policy regarding director attendance at our annual stockholder meetings; however, all of the then-current directors attended the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Company’s Code of Professional Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Related Party Transactions Policy are available on the Investor Relations section of our website atabout.etrade.com in thesub-section titled “Corporate Governance” section.Governance.” You may also request a copy of each of these documents free of charge by writing to E*TRADE Financial Corporation, Ballston Tower, 671 North Glebe Road, 12th15th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203-2120, Attention: Corporate Secretary. We intend to post on our corporate website any amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Professional Conduct that appliesapply to our executive officers and directors. The information on our website is not a part of this Proxy Statement.

Risk Management

The Board plays an active role, as a whole and also at the committee level, in overseeing management of the Company’s risks. The Board regularly reviews reports from members of senior management and committees on areas of material risk to the Company, including credit, interest rate, liquidity, market, operational, strategic, reputational, information technology, information securityincluding cybersecurity, data, legal, and cyber security, legal, regulatory and compliance risks. In particular, the Risk Oversight Committee assists the Board

and senior management, including the

Company’s Chief Risk Officer, the Company’s General Counsel, and the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer and the Company’s Chief Information Security Officer (the “CISO”), in the effective identification, assessment and management of the Company’s risks and in working to manage and monitor the financial risk and return of the Company. The Risk Oversight Committee oversees and reviews with senior management the capital planning processes, the Company’s capital position and capital adequacy, and consolidated capital reporting. The Risk Oversight Committee also oversees, reviews and challenges senior management and, when applicable, recommends to the Board for its approval policies related to the financial and risk management of the Company and its subsidiaries and oversees the Company’s implementation of such policies. These include policies relating to capital, funding, liquidity and funds transfer, risk, asset and liability management and cash management, and policies for assessing and managing exposure of the Company’s operational risk, credit risk, market risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, reputational risk, information technology information security and cyber securityrisk, including cybersecurity risk, data risk, strategic risk, legal risk, and legal, regulatory and compliance risk. Additionally, the Risk Oversight Committee reviews the Company’s business continuity plan, strategic plan, strategic transactions, and proposed investments, and assists in defining the Company’s Enterprise Risk Appetite Statement. The Risk Oversight Committee makes recommendations regarding the Company’s Enterprise Risk Appetite Statement to the Board for its approval considering with senior management the Company’s risk capacity, risk appetite, global risk limits, current risk profile, remediation protocols and risk exceptions.

On a quarterly basis, the CISO updates the Risk Oversight Committee on Information Security and Cybersecurity developments. On an annual basis, the Risk Oversight Committee reviews and approves the Company’s Information Security Program and the Information Technology/Cybersecurity Risk Management Policy and the Board reviews and approves the Company’s Information Technology Strategy, including its Information Security Strategy, and its Information Security/Cybersecurity Policy.

The Compensation Committee assists the Board in evaluating risks arising from Company executive andnon-executive compensation programs. The Governance Committee assists the Board in overseeing risks associated with Board organization, membership and structure, succession planning for our directors and executive officers, and corporate governance. The Audit Committee assists the Board in overseeing risks associated with financial reporting and internal controls.

Director Independence

The Board has adopted categorical standards to assist in its evaluation of the independence of directors. These standards describe various types of relationships that could exist between a Board member and the Company and set thresholds at which such relationships would be deemed to be material in the determination of a director’s independence. Although any director who meets the independence criteria of Nasdaq and the Board’s own categorical standards (as well as Rule10A-3(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), in the case of Audit Committee members, and Nasdaq Rule 5605(d)(2), in the case of Compensation Committee members) will be presumed to be independent, the Board may make a decision to the contrary based on its review of any other relevant factors. The Board’s categorical standards are as follows:

 

A director who serves as an executive officer or employee of, or beneficially owns more than a 10% equity interest in, any corporation, partnership or other business entity that during the most recently completed fiscal year made payments to the Company or received payments from the Company for property or services, is still presumed independent if such payments were less than the greater of: (a) 5% of such other entity’s gross consolidated revenues for such fiscal year; and (b) $200,000.

 

A director who serves as an executive officer or employee of, or beneficially owns more than a 10% equity interest in, any bank, corporation, partnership or other business entity to which the Company was indebted at the end of its most recently completed fiscal year is still presumed independent if the indebtedness is in an amount less than the greater of: (a) 5% of such other entity’s total consolidated assets at the end of such fiscal year; and (b) $200,000.

 

A director who is a member or employee of a law firm that has provided services to the Company during the most recently completed fiscal year is still presumed independent if the total billings for such services were less than the greater of: (a) 5% of the law firm’s gross revenues for such fiscal year; and (b) $200,000.

A director who is a partner, executive officer or employee of any investment banking firm that has performed services for the Company (other than as a participating underwriter in a syndicate) during the most recently completed fiscal year is still presumed independent if the total compensation received for such services was less than the greater of: (a) 5% of the investment banking firm’s consolidated gross revenues for such fiscal year; and (b) $200,000.

After a review of all relevant factors and applying these categorical standards and the independence criteria of Nasdaq, the Board determined that, all directors, except for Messrs. Lawson and Roessner, were independent during 2016.all directors and Mr. Ellertson are independent.

The Board also determined that each member of the Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Governance Committee and Risk Oversight Committee is independent under the applicable standards and that each of Messrs. Carbone and Sclafani are eachChersi is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under SEC rules.

Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees

The Governance Committee uses various methods to identify director nominees. The Governance Committee regularly assesses the appropriate size and composition of the Board and the particular needs of the Board, considering skill sets required and whether any vacancies are expected due to retirement or otherwise. Candidates may come to the attention of the Governance Committee through current Board members, professional search firms, stockholders or other parties. While there is no formal diversity policy or fixed set of qualifications that must be satisfied before a candidate will be considered, we seek nominees with a broad diversity of skills, experience, expertise, professions geographic representation and backgrounds. All candidates are then evaluated based on a review of the individual’s qualifications, skills, independence, experience, expertise and business acumen, including the criteria included in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Board’s desire to draw on diverse perspectives and expertise in conducting its work.

Under our Bylaws, there shall be no fewer than six and no more than twelve directors concurrently serving on the Board.

Our Bylaws permit the Board to increase or decrease its size within the authorized range and to add new directors between stockholder meetings. Any director appointed by the Board in accordance with the preceding sentence shall hold office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders.

Submission of Director Nominees to the Governance Committee by Stockholders

The Governance Committee will consider director candidates submitted by any stockholder who has continuously held at least 5% of our voting securities (either directly or as part of a group) for at least one year and is not a competitor of the Company. Such submissions should (i) be accompanied by evidence of the stockholder’s ownership during the preceding 12 months; (ii) include a statement that the stockholder is not a competitor of the Company; and (iii) comply with the advance notice requirements set forth in Section 1.08 of the Company’s Bylaws. Candidates submitted by any stockholder for election must also comply with the additional requirements set forth in Section 1.09 of the Company’s Bylaws. The Governance Committee followswill follow the same process and usesuse the same criteria for evaluating candidates proposed by stockholders as it does for candidates proposed by other parties. The Governance Committee will consider such candidacy and will advise the recommending stockholder of its final decision. AnyEach Board nominee, for the Board, at the request of the Board, must submit a statement that, if elected, the nominee intends to comply with the Company’s majority voting policy described below.

Submissions of director candidates by stockholders should be mailed to E*TRADE Financial Corporation, Ballston Tower, 671 North Glebe Road, 12th15th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203-2120, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Board Leadership

The Board currently believes that separating the functions of Chair of the Board, Lead Independent Director from the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) generally strengthens the Board’s independence from management. From January 1, 2016 until September 12, 2016, Mr. Lawson served as the Company’s Non-Executive Chairman of the Board. In September 2016, the Board considered and ultimately determined to reconfigure the leadership of the Company to better focus on accelerating the growth of our core brokerage business while continuing to deliver long-term value for our stockholders. Effective September 12, 2016, Mr. Lawson was appointed Executive Chairman, Mr. Roessner was appointed CEO and director, and Mr. Kabat was appointed Lead Independent Director. We believe this structure is appropriate for the Company because it reinforces the strength ofstrengthens the Board’s independence from management while positioningcontinuing to leverage the experience and perspective of the Chair of the Board and positions the Company to continue to execute on its commitment to stockholders to grow our core business.

There are no arrangements or understandings between Messrs. Lawson, Roessner or Kabat and any other persons pursuant to which he was elected to such positions. There are also no family relationships between any of the foregoing directors and any director or executive officer of the Company. As indicated under “Transactions with Related Persons” below, none of the foregoing directors have a direct or indirect material interest in any transaction required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.

Majority Voting Standard and Director Resignation Policy

Our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the voting standard for the election of directors in uncontested elections is a majority voting standard. Under our majority voting standard, in an uncontested election, each nominee shall be elected to the Board by the majority of the votes cast with respect to the director’s election (that is, the number of votes “for” a director’s election must exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to that director’s election). Directors will be elected by plurality vote in contested elections (that is, when the number of nominees for election exceeds the number of directors to be elected). Whether an election is contested or not is determined on the last day by which stockholders may submit notice to nominate a person for election as a director pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws.

If a nominee who is serving as a director is not elected by a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in an uncontested election, Delaware law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” However, under our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, each director must submit in advance an irrevocable, contingent resignation to the Chair of the Governance Committee that the Board may accept if the director fails to be elected by the majority of the votes cast with respect to the director’s election in an uncontested election. In that situation, the Governance Committee will act on an expedited basis to determine whether to recommend that the Board accept the director’s

resignation, and submit its recommendation to the Board. The Board will act on the Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind its decision within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote. The Governance Committee, in making its recommendation, and the Board, in making its decision, may each consider any factors or other information that it considers appropriate and relevant.

The Board expects that any director whose resignation becomes effective pursuant to this policy will excuse himself or herself from participating in the consideration of his or her resignation by either the Governance Committee or the Board. If an incumbent director’s resignation is not accepted, he or she will continue to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected, or until his or her earlier removal. All nominees currently serve on the Board.

Board Evaluation Process

In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charter of each committee, on an annual basis our Board and committees each conduct a rigorous self-evaluation process that includes individual evaluations by each director. The process, which proceeds independently from the Company’s management, is overseen by our Governance Committee with the assistance of an independent outside advisor. Each director provides written responses and discusses his or her feedback on the performance and effectiveness of the Board and the committees on which they serve. The feedback is compiled anonymously and presented to the Board. The Board believes that this annual evaluation process supports its effectiveness and continuous improvement.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Introduction

Our Director Compensation program reflects our desire to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified individuals who have the skills, experience, expertise and background necessary to serve on the board of directors of a company of our size and regulatory complexity and who can continue to guide the Company to provide long-term value to its stockholders. Accordingly, our Director Compensation program is designed to provide ournon-employee directors with a mix of cash and long-term equity compensation that both fairly compensates them for the services they provide to us asnon-employee directors and aligns their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

20162018 Annual Review of Director Compensation Program

The Governance Committee reviews the structure and philosophy of our Director Compensation program on an annual basis. In the second quarter of 2016,2018, the Governance Committee, with the advice ofsupported by its independent compensation consultant, analyzed the overall level and mix of compensation delivered by our Director Compensation program as compared to the Company’s peer group.group and conducted a thorough review of current trends and best practices regarding director compensation. The Governance Committee determined during its 20162018 annual review that the existing Director Compensation levelsprogram remained appropriate.appropriate and therefore did not make any change to the programs in effect on December 31, 2017.

In 2016,early 2019, the Governance Committee conducted a review of the compensation of our Chair of the Board formedand our Lead Independent Director determining it was appropriate to realign the compensation of these two additional advisory working groups,roles with respect to the Growth Initiative Working Group andCompany’s peer group. As a result of this review, the Integration Working Group, to provide advice and counsel to management on the respective topics. The Governance Committee approved andetermined it was appropriate to make the following changes to the Director Compensation program:

Increased the additional annual retainerequity compensation for each advisory working group chair of $15,000, payable to all working group chairs. Mr. Healy and Mses. Saeger (Chair) and Weaver are membersservice as the Chair of the Growth Initiative Working GroupBoard from $50,000 to $150,000;

Decreased the additional annual cash retainer paid for service as the Lead Independent Director from $50,000 to $25,000; and Messrs. Kabat (Chair) and Lam and Ms. Leibowitz are members of

Decreased the Integration Working Group.additional annual equity compensation for service as the Lead Independent Director from $50,000 to $25,000.

2016The changes in the Director Compensation program for 2019 are not reflected in the director compensation tables below because such tables are based on compensation for fiscal year 2018.

2018 Director Compensation

Cash Compensation.The Director Compensation policyprogram for cash fees fornon-employee directors in 20162018 was as follows:

Annual Board Retainer for All Board Members

  $50,000 

Additional Annual Retainer for Each Committee Chair

  $25,000 
Additional Annual Retainer for Service as Non-Executive Chair of the Board or Lead Independent Director  $50,000 

Additional Annual Retainer for Each Advisory Working Group Chair

  $15,000 

Additional Annual Retainer for All Advisory Working Group Members

  $10,000 

Each Board Meeting Attended or Action by Written Consent

  $2,500 

Each Committee Meeting Attended or Action by Written Consent as Committee Chair

  $2,500 

Each Committee Meeting Attended as Non-Executive Chair or Lead Independent Director(1)

  $2,500 

Each Committee Meeting Attended or Action by Written Consent as Committee Member

  $2,000 

 

(1)

 Annual Board Retainer for All Board Members

$120,000  

 Additional Annual Retainer for Each Committee Chair

$25,000  

 Additional Annual Retainer for Service asIn addition to membership on any particular committee, Mr. Lawson, during his service as our Non-Executive Chairman prior to his appointment as Executive Chairman on September 12, 2016, and Mr. Kabat during his services as Chair of the Board or Lead Independent Director beginning on September 12, 2016 were each invited to attend all meetings

$50,000  

 Annual Retainer for All Advisory Working Group and Special Committee Members

$10,000  

 Each Board Meeting Attended in Excess of the Board’s committees in anex officiocapacity and received compensation for each committee meeting attended in that capacity.15 Meetings Per Calendar Year

$2,500  

EquityCompensation.The Director Compensation policy for equity compensation fornon-employee directors in 20162018 was as follows:

 

Non-employee directors receive initial grants of restricted stock awards when they join the Board (generally apro-rated portion of the annual grant provided to ournon-employee directors) and thenthereafter receive an annual grantsgrant of restricted stock awards ifre-elected at the time of our annual meeting.

Ournon-employee directors who were serving as ofsuch on the date of our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, other than Mr. Lawson,Kabat, our Lead Independent Director, each received a grant of restricted stock awards with a fair market value on the grant date equal to $100,000.

Mr. Lawson, who was serving as our Non-Executive Chairman as of the date of our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, received a grant of restricted stock awards with a fair market value on the grant date equal to $150,000.

Mr. Kabat received a grant of restricted stock awards with a fair market value on the date of grant equal to $33,000, reflecting a pro-rated additional annual retainer upon appointment$130,000.

Mr. Kabat, who was serving as our Lead Independent Director effective September 12, 2016.on the date of our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, received a grant of restricted stock awards with a fair market value on the date of grant equal to $180,000.

As a part of our overall Director Compensation program,non-employee directors may elect, on an annual basis, to defer all or a portion of their cash and equity compensation for service on the Board and/or its committees into deferred restricted stock units (“DSUs”) issued under the Company’s 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan pursuant to the terms of our Director Compensation Deferral Program (the “Deferral Program”). Grants of DSUs are issued based on the fair market value of our Common Stock on the grant date (measured as the average of the high and low of the priceprices of our Common Stock on the grant date) and fully vest one year following the grant.grant date. At the time of deferral,non-employee directors must elect settlement of the DSUs into shares of our Common StockStock. In 2018, directors had the option to elect settlement in either (i) one lump payoutdistribution on the first anniversary of the date on which Board service is completed, (ii) five equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date on which Board service is completed, or (ii) five (5) equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of(iii) one distribution 30 days following the date on which Board service is completed.

Each restricted stock or DSU award, as applicable, granted to anon-employee director in 20162018 vests one year from the date of issuance, subject to immediate vesting upon (i) certain changes in the ownership or control of the Company or (ii) the death or disability of the director while serving as a Board member.

Expense Reimbursement and PerquisitesPerquisites.Allnon-employee

All non-employee directors receive reimbursement for reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with meetings of the Board and its committees and for attending up to three director education programs.Non-employee directors do not receive perquisites, but are eligible to participate in the Deferral Program.perquisites.

20162018 Director Compensation Table

The following table below does not include Mr. Roessner,shows information regarding the compensation paid during 2018 tonon-employee directors who did not receive separate compensation for his serviceserved on the Board. The table below also does not include Mr. Lawson. While Mr.Board during the year. Messrs. Lawson did receive compensation for his services as our Non-Executive Chairman prior to his appointment as our Executive Chairman on September 12, 2016, that compensation is included in the “2016 Summary Compensation Table” set forth on page 39and Roessner were both employees of the Proxy Statement.Company during 2018 and therefore received no compensation under the Director Compensation program.

 

Name

  Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash

($)(1)
   Stock
Awards
($) (2)  (3) (4)
   Total
($)(5)
 

Richard J. Carbone

   91,500    149,995    241,495 

James P. Healy

       265,448    265,448 

Kevin T. Kabat

   139,000    122,989    261,989 

Frederick W. Kanner

   164,000    99,997    263,997 

James Lam

   171,000    99,997    270,997 

Shelley B. Leibowitz

   146,500    99,997    246,497 

Rebecca Saeger

   200,000    99,997    299,997 

Joseph L. Sclafani

   163,500    99,997    263,497 

Gary H. Stern

   136,000    99,997    235,997 

Donna L. Weaver

   167,500    118,475    285,975 

 Name   

Fees

Earned or

Paid in

Cash

($) (1)

    

Stock

Awards

($) (2) (3) (4)

  

Other
Compensation

($) (2) (5)

    

Total

($) (6)

 

 

 Richard J. Carbone

 

  

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

          269,626 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          3,920 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

        273,546 

 

 

 

 

 

 James P. Healy

 

  

 

 

 

 

107,500 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

162,447 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,202 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

274,149 

 

 

 

 

 

 Kevin T. Kabat

 

  

 

 

 

 

176,083 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

179,977 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

390 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

356,450 

 

 

 

 

 

 Frederick W. Kanner

 

  

 

 

 

 

101,334 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

129,987 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

231,321 

 

 

 

 

 

 James Lam

 

  

 

 

 

 

151,083 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

129,987 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

281 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

281,351 

 

 

 

 

 

 Shelley B. Leibowitz

 

  

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

255,895 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,623 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

257,518 

 

 

 

 

 

 Rebecca Saeger

 

  

 

 

 

 

155,000 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

129,987 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

281 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

285,268 

 

 

 

 

 

 Joseph L. Sclafani

 

  

 

 

 

 

135,208 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

129,987 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

281 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

265,476 

 

 

 

 

 

 Gary H. Stern

 

  

 

 

 

 

120,000 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

129,987 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

258 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

250,245 

 

 

 

 

 

 Donna L. Weaver

 

  

 

 

 

 

155,000 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

129,987 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,270 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

287,257 

 

 

 

 

 

 Joshua A. Weinreich

 

  

 

 

 

 

        18,000 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

97,468 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

223 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

115,691 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Director fees are paid quarterly in arrears. Amounts reported in this column constitute fees paid in cash during fiscal year 2016.2018. The amount reported in this column for Mr. Healy includes annual cash retainers for service on special pricing committee.

 

(2)

Amounts reported in this column constitute the aggregate grant date fair value of each award calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. For more information regarding the assumptions used718, and includes DSUs granted in determining the fair valuelieu of awards, please refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements containeddirector fees paid in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the SEC on February 22, 2017.cash.

 

(3)

Thenon-employee directors listed in the 20162018 Director Compensation Table who were serving as of May 12, 2016,10, 2018, the date of our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each received a grant of restricted stock awards on May 13, 201611, 2018 that vests on the first anniversary of the date of issuance.grant date. The fair market value of the stock awards (measured as the average of the high and low of the pricesale prices of our Common Stock on the grant date) for each suchnon-employee director was equal to $100,000.$130,000, except Mr. Kabat who received a pro-rated grant of stock awards equal to $90,000 on June 16, 2016$180,000 in connection with his appointment as a director and an additional pro-rated grant of stock awards equal to $33,000 on September 12, 2016 in connection with his appointmentrole as Lead Independent Director. Ms. WeaverMr. Carbone elected to receive herhis annual cash retainer, annual stock compensation and annual cash retainer for service on a special pricing committee in the form of DSUs in accordance with the Deferral Program. Each of Messrs. Carbone and HealyMs. Leibowitz elected to receive both theirher annual boardcash retainer and their annual stock compensation in the form of DSUs in accordance with the Deferral Program. Additionally, Mr. HealyStern and Ms. Weaver each elected to receive his 2016their annual stock compensation earned for meeting attendance in the form of DSUs in accordance with the Deferral Program.

 

(4)

As of December 31, 2016,2018, Messrs. Kanner,Healy, Lam, and Sclafani Stern, and Mses. Leibowitz and Saeger each held an aggregate of 3,9542,010 unvested restricted stock awards, Mr. Kabat held 2,783 unvested restricted stock awards and Mr. KabatWeinreich held 4,9041,593 unvested restricted stock awards. As of December 31, 2016,2018, Mr. Carbone held 5,9314,561 unvested DSUs, Mr. Healy held 10,354652 unvested DSUs, Ms. Leibowitz held 2,332 unvested DSUs and Mr. Stern and Ms. Weaver each held 4,7432,010 unvested DSUs. As of December 31, 2016, Messrs. Kanner2018, Mr. Sclafani and SclafaniMs. Weaver each held an aggregate of 4,000 vested outstanding stock options and Ms. Weaver held an aggregate of 6,0002,000 vested outstanding stock options.

(5)

Amounts reported in this column constitute the value of dividend equivalent units (“DEUs”) awarded in connection with a director’s DSUs, if any, and cash dividends paid on a director’s unvested restricted stock, if any.

(6)

There are no compensation or benefit programs available fornon-employee directors other than the cash feesamounts and stockequity grants described above. Consequently, the Company has not included columns in the 20162018 Director Compensation Table fornon-equity incentive plan compensation or change in pension value andnon-qualified deferred compensation earnings, or all other compensation, as the values for each of these items would be reported as zero.

Policy of Equity Ownership Policy for Board of Directors

The Board believes that directors should hold meaningful equity ownership positions in the Company to help align the interests of directors with those of stockholders. Under our policy regarding equity ownershipEquity Ownership Policy for directors,non-employee directors are expected to be beneficial owners of shares of Common Stock with a market value equivalent to at least two years’three years of annual cash retainer fees (currently equal to $100,000) payable to non-employee directors (not including any additional retainer for service as a Committee Chair,Non-Executive Chairman, Chair of the Board, Lead Independent Director or on an advisory working group andor special committee, as adjusted from time to time) within twothree years of joining the Board. As a result, within three years of joining the Board, each of ournon-employee directors is required to hold shares of the Company’s Common Stock with an aggregate value of at least $360,000.

For purposes of the Equity Ownership Policy described above, anon-employee director’s shareholdings include, in addition to shares held outright, unvested restricted stock awards, unvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”), vested DSUs and thein-the-money portion of vested but unexercised stock options. The value of each RSU and DSU is treated the same as a share of the Company’s Common Stock.

Until anon-employee director has met this equity ownership guideline,the requirements of our Equity Ownership Policy, he or she is expected to hold 100% of any stock acquired through exercise of a stock option or vesting of restricted stock, net of shares sold to cover the cost of acquisition and any tax obligation. During 2016,2018, each of the Company’snon-employee directors was in compliance with this policy. our guidelines.

Anti-Pledging and Hedging Policy

The Company does not permitCompany’s Equity Ownership Policy prohibits directors to pledge or engagefrom engaging in hedging transactions involving Companythe Company’s securities. This prohibition extends to short selling and trading in derivatives with respect to the Company’s securities. The Equity Ownership Policy also prohibits directors from pledging shares of the Company’s common stock.

PROPOSAL 2

NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (THE “SAY-ON-PAY“SAY-ON-PAY VOTE”)

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, which Congress adopted as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, we are asking that you indicate your support, in anon-binding advisory vote, for the compensation policies and practices relating to our NEOs as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the accompanying compensation tables and the related narrative appearing on pages 26 to 4522 through 40 of this Proxy Statement. The next such vote will occur at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

As described in detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” we strive to provide a majority of compensation for our NEOs in the form of cash and equity incentives that encourage and reward strong long-term performance and align the financial interests of our NEOs with the interests of our stockholders. Although, as an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the Board or the Compensation Committee, the Board and the Compensation Committee, in exercise of their fiduciary duties, will consider the outcome of the advisory vote in determining future compensation decisions.

Stockholders are being asked to vote on the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC (Item 402 of RegulationS-K), including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and the related narrative disclosures.

The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR the proposal to approve the

compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as described in this Proxy Statement.

PROPOSAL 3

NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO SELECT THE FREQUENCY OF THE SAY-ON-PAY VOTE

As described in Proposal 2 above, our stockholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. This Proposal 3 affords stockholders the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, for their preference as to how frequently we should seek stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation. By voting with respect to this proposal, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer that we conduct future advisory votes on executive compensation once every one, two, or three years. Stockholders also may, if they wish, abstain from casting a vote on this proposal.

Our stockholders voted on a similar proposal in 2011 with the majority voting to hold the Say-on-Pay vote every year. Our Board of Directors believes that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs once every year is the most appropriate alternative for the Company at this time. Although, as an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the Board, the Board, in the exercise of its fiduciary duties, will consider the outcome of the advisory vote in determining how frequently we will seek stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs.

The proxy card provides stockholders with the opportunity to choose among four options (holding the vote every one, two or three years, or abstaining) and, therefore, stockholders will not be voting to approve or disapprove the recommendation of the Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote for the selection of ONE YEAR as the

frequency of the Say-on-Pay Vote

PROPOSAL 4

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm responsible for auditing the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017,2019, and we are asking the stockholders to ratify its appointment of Deloitte. Deloitte has been retained as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 1995.1994. The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of Deloitte to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

If the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee of the Board will reconsider the appointment but is not obligated to appoint another independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent auditor at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

A representative of Deloitte is expected to attend the Annual Meeting, will be given an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Audit Fees Paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP

The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte and their respective affiliates for professional services rendered in 20162018 and 20152017 are as follows:

 

   Audit Fees(1)   Audit-
Related

Fees(2)
   Tax Fees (3)   Total Fees 

2016

  $4,640,000   $1,600,000   $497,000   $6,737,000 

2015

  $4,420,000   $1,280,000   $329,000   $6,029,000 
          Audit Fees (1)            Audit-Related Fees(2)           Tax Fees (3)                   Other Fees (4)                   Total Fees         

 

 2018

 

 

 

 $

 

 

4,750,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

 

917,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

 

684,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

 

48,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

 

6,399,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 2017

 

 

 

 $

 

 

4,600,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

 

1,000,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

 

642,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

 

20,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

 

6,262,000 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Audit Fees in 20162018 and 20152017 include fees incurred for the annual audit and quarterly reviews of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the annual audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 2015,2017, respectively. Audit Fees also include review of documents filed with the SEC and participation in the meetings of the Audit Committee.

 

(2)

Audit-Related Fees in 20162018 and 20152017 include fees for control-related attest services, international statutory audits, assistance related to regulatory compliance, consultations related to accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events and/or the actual or potential effect of final or proposed rules, standards, or interpretations by the SEC, FASB, or other regulatory or standard-setting bodies, and work performed in connection with registration statements and other SEC filings.

 

(3)

Tax Fees in 20162018 and 20152017 include fees for compliance and preparation of tax filings, and fees for tax advice and planning related to various transactions.tax matters.

(4)

Other Fees in 2018 and 2017 represent subscriptions for research and guidance tools to the Company, and in 2018 also includes additional advisory services related to a project management methodology framework.

The Audit Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with the Company’s retention of Deloitte and all audit andnon-audit services and fees werepre-approved by the Audit Committee either individually or by category. The Audit Committee has reviewed the nature of allnon-audit services provided by Deloitte and concluded that the provision of such services areis compatible with maintaining the firm’s ability to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm.

Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committeepre-approves all audit and permissiblenon-audit services provided by the independent auditors. The Audit Committee charter allows the Audit Committee to delegate its authority topre-approve services to one or more Audit Committee members, provided that the designees present thepre-approvals to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting.

The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.2019.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

In addition to Rodger A. Lawson, Executive Chairman, and Karl A. Roessner, Chief Executive Officer, the following are our executive officers as of March 29, 2017:26, 2019:

 

Name

    Age as of
May 11, 20179, 2019            
 

Current Position

 Chad E. Turner

48

Chief Financial Officer

Michael A. Pizzi

    42

44

 

Executive Vice President, Chief FinancialOperating Officer

Michael J. Curcio

55Chief Brokerage Officer

Michael E. Foley

    65

57

 Chief Technology

Executive Vice President, Institutional and Operations OfficerVice Chairman of the Executive Committee

Michael A. PizziChad E. Turneris Chief Financial Officer of the Company, responsible for all finance and accounting functions, for E*TRADE Financial, including financial reporting, planning, tax, treasury,and treasury. Mr. Turner has been with the Company since 2004 and has served in several leadership roles in finance and beyond. Mr. Turner previously served as well ashead of financial planning and analysis, overseeing the forecasting and performance analysis functions that drive the Company’s investor relations, corporate communications, facilitiesstrategic direction. Prior to this role, Mr. Turner served as Vice President, Accounting, with experience in all areas of finance including acquisition integration, treasury, risk management, modeling, and procurementdue diligence. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Turner served as Controller for Verestar, Inc. where he oversaw worldwide accounting, reporting, tax, and treasury functions with responsibility for all financial audit requirements and technical research. Mr. Turner started his career in public accounting at Arthur Andersen, and earned his Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from Georgetown University. He holds a Certified Public Accountant designation.

Michael A. Pizzi is Chief Operating Officer of the Company, responsible for all operations, finance, and technology functions. Mr. Pizzi has been with the Company since 2003 and most recentlyhas served in several executive roles including as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Risk Officer. Prior to thatthese roles he served in a variety of leadership positions including as the Corporate and bankBank Treasurer during which timewhere he was responsible for all portfolio, capital and liquidity management. He also previously held various positions in the Company’s portfolio management and derivatives functions. Before joining the Company, Mr. Pizzi worked in asset/liability management at both Lehman Brothers and First Maryland Bank, as well as in capital markets research for the Federal Reserve Board. Mr. Pizzi earned a BAB.A. in Economics from Ursinus College, is a CFA charterholder, and holds the Financial Risk Manager (FRM) designation.

Michael J. Curciois Chief Brokerage OfficerExecutive Vice President, Institutional and Vice Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Company, responsible for leadingoverseeing the retail brokerage business,Company’s corporate and advisor services channels, including all Product, Digital Channels, all Marketing,the award-winning Equity Edge Online and Liberty platforms, and the Company’s Corporate Services channel. Previously,registered investment advisor referral network. Prior to these roles, he served as Chief Brokerage Officer with responsibility for overseeing the Company’s retail brokerage business. Beforere-joining the Company in 2016, Mr. Curcio was the CEO of Aperture Group, LLC, the parent company of OptionsHouse. A respected veteran of the online brokerage industry, he has a25-year track record of releasing award-winning products, implementing customer retention strategies, and building cross-functional teams. Before joining Aperture Group and OptionsHouse, Mr. Curcio spent 11 years at E*TRADE,the Company, last serving as the head of the Company’s brokerage business, in addition to the corporate services and market making channels. Prior to E*TRADE,first joining the Company, Mr. Curcio spent 15 years at TD Waterhouse, last serving as EVP of Customer Relationship Management. Mr. Curcio received a BSB.S. in Business from the State University of New York, at Plattsburgh. He previously served on the Board of Governors of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange (PHLX), now NASDAQ OMXNasdaq PHLX.

Michael E. Foleyis Chief Technology and Operations Officer of the Company, a position which oversees all of E*TRADE’s Technology Infrastructure, Technology Development, and Operations. Mr. Foley’s extensive background in project management makes him well-suited to oversee a wide range of programs critical to the successful execution of the Company’s strategic imperatives. Prior to joining E*TRADE, Mr. Foley worked as a consultant at Foley & Cunningham from April 2009 to February 2013. Mr. Foley also held several roles at Barclays Bank Plc from January 2005 to April 2009, including Interim Chief Information Officer and Chief Administrative Officer, where he was responsible for several global functions supporting 170,000 employees across 60 countries. Mr. Foley began his career at Booz & Company, where he helped clients develop strategies and plans to address technology and operational issues over his 16 year career. Mr. Foley is a member of the Board of Directors of UMUC Ventures, a non-profit company. Mr. Foley studied at Hatfield Polytechnic in Hertfordshire, England.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock as of March 13, 2017,11, 2019, by (i) each director;director and nominee; (ii) each NEO; (iii) all current directors and executive officers as a group; and (iv) each person who is known to the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock of the Company. Unless otherwise indicated, all persons named as beneficial owners of the Company’s Common Stock have sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to the shares indicated as owned. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, the address for each person named below is c/o E*TRADE Financial Corporation, 1271 Avenue of the Americas, 14th11 Times Square, 32nd Floor, New York, New York 10020-1302.10036.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

  Number of Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned (1)
   Number of Shares of Common
Stock Beneficially Owned Plus
Certain Outstanding Equity
Awards(2)
   

Percentage of
Common Stock
  Beneficially Owned (3)  

DIRECTORSAND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS:

 

    

Carbone, Richard J.

   2,470    14,673   *

Curcio, Michael J.

          *

Foley, Michael E.

   48,700    48,700   *

Healy, James P.

   10,000    20,974   *

Idzik, Paul T. (4)

   449,903    449,903   *

Kabat, Kevin T.

   4,904    4,904   *

Kanner, Frederick W.(5)

   44,315    44,315   *

Lam, James

   19,848    19,848   *

Lawson, Rodger A.

   40,003    52,206   *

Leibowitz, Shelley B.

   3,954    9,099   *

Pizzi, Michael A.(6)

   60,625    60,625   *

Roessner, Karl A.(7)

   124,341    124,341   *

Saeger, Rebecca

   23,184    23,184   *

Sclafani, Joseph L.(8)

   34,527    34,527   *

Stern, Gary H.

   11,723    11,723   *

Weaver, Donna L.(9)

   51,911    58,528   *

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

All current directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)   480,505    527,647   *

STOCKHOLDERS OWNING MORETHAN 5%:

 

    

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(10)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

   27,991,222    27,991,222   10.19%

BlackRock, Inc.(11)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

   21,689,370    21,689,370     7.90%

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(12)

100 E. Pratt Street

Baltimore, MD 21202

   13,887,061    13,887,061     5.06%
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned (1)
  Number of Shares of Common
Stock Beneficially Owned Plus
Certain Outstanding Equity
Awards (2)
  Percentage of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned (3)
 

DIRECTORS, NOMINEES AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS(4):

 

  

 

 Richard J. Carbone

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,470 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27,607 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Robert J. Chersi

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,253 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,253 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Michael J. Curcio

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,943 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,943 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Jaime W. Ellertson

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 James P. Healy

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,010 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

49,819 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Kevin T. Kabat

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,918 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,918 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 James Lam

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,635 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,635 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Rodger A. Lawson

 

 

 

 

 

 

81,300 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99,537 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Shelley B. Leibowitz

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,741 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,098 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Michael A. Pizzi

 

 

 

 

 

 

59,481 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59,481 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Karl A. Roessner

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,920 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,920 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Rebecca Saeger

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,971 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,971 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Joseph L. Sclafani(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,314 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,314 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Chad E. Turner

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,575 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,575 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Donna L. Weaver(6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

48,447 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62,876 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Joshua A. Weinreich

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,318 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,318 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

All current directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)

 

 

 

 

 

 

434,296 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

528,265 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 STOCKHOLDERS OWNING MORE THAN 5%:

 

   

 The Vanguard Group, Inc. (7)

 100 Vanguard Blvd.

 Malvern, PA 19355

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,739,566 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,739,566 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.72% 

 

 

 

 

 BlackRock, Inc. (8)

 55 East 52nd Street

 New York, NY 10055

 

 

 

 

 

20,178,280 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,178,280 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.23% 

 

 

 

 

 PRIMECAP Management Company (9)

 177 E. Colorado Blvd., 11th Floor

 Pasadena, CA 91105

 

 

 

 

 

13,348,625 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,348,625 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.45% 

 

 

 

 

 

*

Less than 1%

 

(1)

IncludesBeneficial ownership reported in the table has been determined according to SEC regulations and includes shares of Common Stock that are issuablemay be acquired within 60 days after March 11, 2019 upon the exercise of vested options.outstanding stock options and the vesting of restricted stock units.

(2)

Includes all of the shares of Common Stock included in the “Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned” column, as increased by the number of DSUs, including DEUs received thereon, that are vested or scheduled to vest within 60 days of March 13, 2017. 11, 2019.Non-employee directors do not have the right to receive the underlying shares of Common Stock for more than 60 days following March 13, 2017.11, 2019. While these additional shares are not beneficially owned for purposes of SEC beneficial ownership rules, the Company has determined to include them in this column to provide more complete information with respect to the applicable individual’s equity holdings in the Company.

 

(3)

Based on 274,700,705245,136,653 shares of Common Stock outstanding on March 13, 2017.11, 2019. Shares of Common Stock subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 13, 201711, 2019 (and shares of Common Stock that may be obtained upon the conversion of convertible securities) are deemed beneficially owned by the person holding such options for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of any other person.

 

(4) 

As of September 12, 2016.December 31, 2018, all of our directors and executive officers were in compliance with our Equity Ownership Policy. For further details, please see Equity Ownership Policy for Board of Directors on page 16, Equity Ownership Policy for NEOs on page 30 and the “Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End” table on page 36.

 

(5)

Includes 4,0002,000 shares of Common Stock that are issuable upon exercise of vested options.

 

(6)

Includes 11,72745,910 shares held by the Weaver Living Trust UAD 11/16/89 and 2,000 shares of Common Stock that are issuable upon exercise of vested options.

 

(7)

Includes 4,837 shares of Common Stock that are issuable upon exercise of vested options.

(8)

Includes 4,000 shares of Common Stock that are issuable upon exercise of vested options.

(9)

Includes 19,389 shares held by Weaver Living Trust UAD 11/16/89 and 6,000 shares of Common Stock that are issuable upon exercise of vested options.

(10)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2017,11, 2019, wherein The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) reported beneficial ownership of 27,991,22228,739,566 shares of Common Stock as of November 30, 2016.December 31, 2018. Vanguard reported sole dispositive power as to 27,507,19428,389,013 of the shares, shared dispositive power as to 484,028350,553 of the shares, sole voting power as to 429,001302,269 of the shares, and shared voting power as to 49,52860,248 of the shares.

 

(11)(8)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 24, 2017, wherein BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) reported beneficial ownership of 21,689,370 shares of Common Stock as of December 31, 2016. BlackRock reported sole voting power as to 19,240,527 of the shares.

(12)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 7, 2017,4, 2019, wherein T. Rowe Price Associates,BlackRock, Inc. (“T. Rowe Price”BlackRock”) reported beneficial ownership of 13,887,06120,178,280 shares of Common Stock as of December 31, 2016. T. Rowe Price2018. BlackRock reported sole dispositive power as to 20,178,280 of the shares and sole voting power as to 3,979,59717,978,109 of the shares.

(9)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 8, 2019, wherein PRIMECAP Management Company (“PRIMECAP”) reported beneficial ownership of 13,348,625 shares of Common Stock as of December 31, 2018. PRIMECAP reported sole dispositive power as to 13,348,625 of the shares and sole voting power as to 8,238,296 of the shares.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introduction

We reconfigured our leadership in September 2016 to better focus on accelerating the growth of our core brokerage business while continuing to deliver long-term value for our stockholders. As part of this reconfiguration, we appointed Rodger A. Lawson as our Executive Chairman and Karl A. Roessner as our Chief Executive Officer. In addition, in connection with our acquisition of Aperture New Holdings, Inc., the ultimate parent company of OptionsHouse (“OptionsHouse”), we appointed Michael J. Curcio, an industry and Company veteran, as our Chief Brokerage Officer. We believe that these individuals, together with the rest of our management team, are strongly positioned to reenergize our brokerage business by focusing on enhancing the overall customer experience, capitalizing on the value of our corporate services channel and strategically utilizing our balance sheet to enhance returns and putting capital to work, while ultimately creating sustainable, long-term value for our stockholders.

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis that follows provides a description of our compensation program for our Executive Chairman, our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, our two other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving aseach of December 31, 2016, and our former Chief Executive Officer.the individuals listed below. We refer to these individuals throughout the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tables and narratives that follow as our named executive officers, or NEOs. For 2016,2018, our named executive officers were as follows:

 

Rodger A. Lawson, former Executive Chairman

 

Karl A. Roessner, Chief Executive Officer

 

Michael A. Pizzi,Chad E. Turner, Chief Financial Officer

 

Michael J. Curcio,A. Pizzi, Executive Vice President, Chief BrokerageOperating Officer

 

Michael E. Foley,J. Curcio, Executive Vice President, Institutional and Vice Chairman of the Executive Committee

In addition to serving as our Chief TechnologyFinancial Officer until December 3, 2018, Mr. Pizzi was appointed to serve as our Chief Operating Officer effective September 21, 2018. On December 3, 2018, Mr. Turner began serving as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Pizzi thereafter continued serving as our Chief Operating Officer with additional responsibilities over our technology organization.

Mr. Curcio served as our Chief Brokerage Officer until December 3, 2018, when he was appointed as our Executive Vice President, Institutional and Operations Officer

Paul T. Idzik, Former ChiefVice Chairman of the Executive OfficerCommittee.

Mr. Lawson transitioned from serving as our Executive Chairman effective December 31, 2018, to resume serving as ournon-executive Chair of the Board effective January 1, 2019.

Executive Compensation Highlights

 

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTSAND STOCKHOLDER PERFORMANCE

Strong financial results for 2018, which include:

•   Total Net Revenue: $2.9 billion in 2018, representing a 21% increase over 2017 total net revenue and a Company record

•   Pre-tax Income: $1.4 billion in 2018, representing a 33% increase over 2017pre-tax income

•   Net Income: $1.1 billion in 2018, representing a 71% increase over 2017 net income and a Company record

•   Return on Common Equity: 17% in 2018, representing an increase of 70% over 2017 return on common equity

•   Earnings per Diluted Common Share: $3.88 per diluted share in 2018, representing an 80% increase over 2017 earnings per diluted share

 

Strong financial results for 2016, which include:

•        Pre-taxIncome: $838 million in 2016, representing a significant increase over 2015 pre-tax income

•        NetIncome: $552 million in 2016, representing a 106% increase over 2015 net income

•        TotalStockholder Return: 17% in 2016 and 76% over the last three years

•        CapitalGeneration and Deployment: distributed $858 million in dividends from bank and broker-dealer subsidiaries to the Company

OTHER KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS

•   Set Company records in 2018 for Daily Average Revenue Trades (“DARTS”), net new brokerage accounts and net new brokerage assets (1)

•   Declared our first ever quarterly dividend on our common stock

•   Completed prior $1 billion share repurchase program and approved a new $1 billion repurchase program

•   Acquired approximately one million brokerage accounts from Capital One

•   Issued $420 million of 4.50% Senior Notes and redeemed Trust Preferred Securities (“TRUPs”)

 

•   Completed the acquisition of OptionsHouseTrust Company of America (“TCA”), a leading provider of technology and custody services to registered investment advisors (“RIAs”), which we rebranded E*TRADE Advisor Services

 

•   IncreasedWe launched the amount of customer cash available for balance sheet growth and exceeded $50 billion in consolidated assets in the first quarter of 2017E*TRADE Advisor Network, a referral program to connect retail customers with qualified RIAs

 

•   Effective February 2017,Optimized the excess capital position in E*TRADE Bank can operate at a 7.5% minimumto 7.0% Tier 1 Leverage Ratio

•        Repurchased $452 million of shares of our Common Stock

•        Identified $21 million of annual run-rate expense reductionsleverage ratio threshold

(1) Record net new brokerage accounts and net new brokerage assets excludeone-time inflows related to acquisitions.

COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

 

•   Annual Cash Bonus awards to NEOseach NEO that was eligible to receive a bonus relating to 2016,2018, which were funded based uponpre-tax income goals, specified key brokerage metrics and individual performance, ranged from 100% to 140%138% of target awards which equated to $0 to $150,000 over targetawards.

 

•   Equity Compensation for NEOs in 20162018 generally consisted of a mix of performance share units (“PSUs”) that vest based upon the achievement of earnings per share targets(“EPS”) and key business initiativesreturn on equity (“ROE”) targets and time-based restricted stock units that vest over three years of continued employmentservice to the Company (“RSUs”), with PSUs relating to 20162018 performance vesting at approximately 120%136.3% of target awards

awards.

COMPENSATION DESIGN

Philosophy and Peers  

•   We assess our compensation levels in comparison to a peer group of comparable companies and place a heavyan emphasis on performance-based pay through Annual Cash Bonuses and Equity Compensation

“Say “Say on Pay”  

•   Our stockholders supported our compensation program with a greater than a 96%95% approval level at our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Annual Cash Bonuses  

•   Annual Cash Bonuses are funded based uponpre-tax income performance and the achievement of specified key brokerage metrics; individual cash bonus amounts are also based, in part, on the individual performance of each NEO

Equity Compensation  

•   PSUs granted in 2018 vest and settle over three successiveone-year performance periods based upon the achievement of earnings per shareEPS and ROE targets

•   Beginning with grants made in 2019, PSUs will vest and key business initiativessettle over a single three-year performance period based upon the achievement of a cumulative EPS target over the three-year period and return on the average ROE metric over the three-year period

•   RSUs vest over three years of continued employmentservice to the Company

Our Executive Compensation Philosophy

Our compensation program for our NEOs is designed to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified individuals and establish a strong link between their pay and the achievement of our business goals. We seek to accomplish these objectives by maintaining a pay for performancepay-for-performance program heavily weighted toward incentives forthat promote sustainable long-term performance, that allocates a significant percentage of annual compensation opportunities for our NEOs toward:as follows:

 

Annual cash bonus payments based on important near-term financial and operational goals that the Compensation Committee believes will improve our long-term results and strategic objectives; andobjectives.

 

Equity compensation grants consistingduring 2018 consisted of: (1) PSUs, which generally vest and settle based upon the achievement of specifiedpre-established performance criteria over three successiveone-year performance periods, and (2) RSUs, which vest ratably over a three-year period, each subject to continued employment. service to the Company.

In consultation with the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee determined that beginning with grants made in 2019, PSUs will vest and settle based upon the achievement of specifiedpre-established performance criteria at the end of a single three-year performance period. The new PSU program is designed to align with the Company’s long term business strategy and key financial targets and metrics. For 2019 PSU grants, the Compensation Committee set the performance criteria based upon the achievement of a cumulative EPS target over the three-year period and return on the average ROE metric over the three-year period.

The Compensation Committee believes that granting a mix of performance-based vesting and time-based vesting awards provides the best method to both align the economic interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders and ensure that a significant portion of each NEO’s compensation is tied to our long-term stock performance.

Key Compensation Practices and Governance

Our 20162018 compensation program for our NEOs contains the following notable good corporate governance features:

 

WHAT WE DO

   

WHAT WE DO NOT DO

    We pay for performance

  

×   We do not allow hedging or pledging of Company stock

    We review tally sheets

  

×   We do not provide excise tax gross-upsallow pledging of Company stock

    We consider relevant peer groups in establishing compensation

  

×   We do not provide excise taxgross-ups

•     We have an Equity Ownership Policy that includes a stock retention requirement until ownership guidelines are met

×   We do not provide defined benefit pensions or SERPs to NEOs

    We have equity ownership guidelines that include a stock retention requirement until ownership guidelines are metrecoupment (clawback) policy

  

×   We do not permit repricing of stock options without stockholder approval

✓ We have a recoupment policy

×  We do not provide excessive perquisites or tax gross-ups on perquisites

    We have independent Board oversight and review the risk profile of compensation plans annually

  

×   We do not provide excessive perquisites

•    We retain an independent compensation consultant

×   We do not provide taxgross-ups on perquisites

•     Alllong-term incentives are granted and settled in equity

×   We do not provide excessive severance benefits

•     The majority of total compensation is variable

×   We do not provide for single-trigger equity vesting in the event of achange-in-control

     We retainhold an independent compensation consultantannual“Say-on-pay vote”

  

×  We do not provide excessive severance benefits

Compensation Considerations for 20162018

20182016 Say-on-Pay Vote. At our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholders supported our “say-on-pay vote,” with more than 96% of the votes cast (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes)voted overwhelmingly in favor of our compensation program for our NEOs.NEOs through our annual“say-on-pay vote.” The Compensation Committee believes this overwhelming approval by our stockholders shows strong support for our compensation philosophy of placing significant weight on incentive pay and continues to use that philosophy as the basis for our compensation program.

Fiscal 20162018 Business Highlights. Our business strategy isin 2018 centered on two key objectives: accelerating the growth of our core brokerage business to drive organic growth and improve market share,competitive position and generating robust earnings growth and healthy returns on capital to deliver long-term value for our stockholders. AcceleratingTo accelerate the growth of our core brokerage business focuseswe focused on enhancing the overall customer experience and capitalizing on the value of our corporate services channel. GeneratingTo generate robust earnings growth and healthy returns on capital focuseswe focused on utilizing our balance sheet to enhance returns, andgenerating double-digit growth in EPS, putting capital to work for the benefit of our stockholders.stockholders and executing on our financial commitments. Our executive compensation program has been designed to recognize and support these efforts.

In determining the appropriate compensation for our NEOs in 2016,2018, the Board and the Compensation Committee recognizedconsidered our business and financial performance. In addition to our metrics and financial results during 2016,2018, they considered the Company’s strategic positioning, the Company’s accomplishment of various operational, strategic and strategicgrowth goals, the regulatorycompetitive environment, and enhanced regulatory expectations and management’s performance against such expectations, market developments and the macro-economic environment, as well as compensation of each of the NEO’s internal and external peers’ compensation.peers.

Mr. Roessner and his team of experienced executives have refocusedcontinued to deliver on our key business objectives, and the Board and the Compensation Committee recognized the following achievements in particular:

 

We engaged with our customers to generate 282,000 DARTs during 2018, up more than 30% from 2017 and a Company record.

We implemented $23.0 billion in new stock plan relationships in 2018, a Company record, which compares favorably to the $25.3 billion implemented during the four prior years combined.

As a result of our improved capital and cash position, the Company was able to declare its first quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per share on our outstanding shares of common stock. The dividend was paid on November 15, 2018. On September 12, 2016, weFebruary 15, 2019, the Company paid its second quarterly common stock dividend.

We completed repurchases under the prior $1 billion share repurchase program and our Board authorized a new $1 billion share repurchase program.

We completed the acquisition of Aperture New Holdings, Inc., the ultimate parent companyapproximately one million retail brokerage accounts from Capital One for a cash purchase price of OptionsHouse, an online brokerage, for $725$109 million. We funded the transaction through the issuanceThe acquisition introduced a significant number of fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock for gross proceeds of $400 million,retail customers to our platforms and the remainder with existing corporate cash;

We ended 2016 with $13.5 billion of off-balance sheet customer cash available for future balance sheet growth. In the first quarter of 2017, we crossed $50 billion in total consolidated assets and are continuing to monitor and prepare for the incremental regulatory and reporting requirements that this balance sheet growth may require;

Effective February 2017, E*TRADE Bank can operate at a 7.5% Tier 1 leverage ratio;service offerings.

 

We distributed $858issued $420 million in dividends from bankof 4.50% Senior Notes due 2028 (Senior Notes) and broker-dealer subsidiariesused the net proceeds to redeem all $413 million of outstanding TRUPs during the Company providing a key sourcethird quarter of corporate cash to the Company;2018.

 

During 2016, we repurchased 19 million sharesWe completed the acquisition of our Common Stock at an averageTCA, a leading provider of technology and custody services to RIAs for a cash purchase price of $23.83 for a total of $452 million. As of December 31, 2016,$275 million, which we have repurchased 20.6 million shares of our Common Stock at an average price of $24.34 for a total of $502 million since we began repurchasing shares in the fourth quarter of 2015.rebranded E*TRADE Advisor Services.

Due to the OptionsHouse acquisition, we did not repurchase shares under the program in the second half of 2016. We will continue to assess the best use of corporate cash and anticipate resuming share repurchases in the second half of 2017; and

 

We refocusedlaunched the E*TRADE Advisor Network, a referral program to connect retail customers with qualified RIAs, which expand our ability to retain retail customers and realigned our organizational structure and identified $21 millionexpand net new assets.

We optimized the excess capital position for E*TRADE Bank to a 7.0% Tier 1 leverage ratio threshold from the previous internal threshold of annual run-rate expense reductions.7.5%.

Process for Determining Executive Compensation

Compensation Committee.As previously described, all members of the Compensation Committee were independent in 2016.are independent. The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and administering compensation programs for our senior executives, including programs for the NEOs. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves NEO compensation or,and, with respect to the compensation of the Executive Chairman, if any, and CEO, recommends their compensation to the independent members of the full Board for approval.

Compensation Consultants.The Compensation Committee has full authority to retain any consultants it deems appropriate. In 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee again retained Pay Governance LLC as its outside compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee on matters including executive compensation practices and market compensation levels. Representatives from Pay Governance LLC attended meetings of the Compensation Committee. No services were provided by Pay Governance LLC to the Company outside of its engagement with the Compensation Committee and the Governance Committee as described above. The Compensation Committee considered all relevant factors in determining the independence of Pay Governance LLC, including those set forth in Rule10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) under the Exchange Act, and determined no conflicts of interest existed with respect to the Committee’s compensation consultant.

Role of Management.The Compensation Committee works with management, led by the CEO, in an effort to ensure that our NEO compensation programs effectively meet the Compensation Committee’s objectives of retaining and motivating highly qualified individuals with the skills and experience necessary to achieve our key business objectives and rewarding desired performance and achievement of goals. In particular, the Compensation Committee considers the CEO’s review of the performance of our other executive officers, given his daily experience with them and particular knowledge of their roles. However, the Compensation Committee ultimately makes its own determinations regarding the form and amount of each NEO’s compensation and may accept or reject any recommendation from its consultants and management. In addition, the Executive Chairman, if any, and CEO are not present when the Compensation Committee or independent members of the full Board determine their respective compensation.

Comparative Data. To determine whether our compensation programs are competitive, the Compensation Committee considered publicly available data provided by Pay Governance LLC concerning programs and compensation levels offered by other companies as well as third party survey information in relevant markets and our industry. In particular, the Compensation Committee reviewed compensation data for the companies listed below, although it did not target a specific percentile for comparing compensation or place specific weights on the sources of pay information. Instead, it used this information as a reference point when considering whether compensation was appropriate and competitive.

The Compensation Committee conducts a thorough review of the peer comparator group each year to ensure the size, scope, performance and business focus of the peer comparator companies reflect the Company’s competitive environment. In 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee, with assistance from Pay Governance LLC, determined thatit was appropriate to adjust the Company’s peer comparator group set in 2015 continued to reflectbetter align the competitive environmentgroup with respect to attracting customersthe Company’s business and talent and therefore did not make any changes.need characteristics. The peer comparator group companies that we used in 2018 are as follows:

 

 

Affiliated Managers Group Inc.

Fifth Third Bank

Nasdaq, Inc.

 Ameriprise Financial

 

  

 

Interactive Brokers

Northern Trust Corporation

Broadridge Financial Solutions

Intercontinental Exchange Group, Inc.

 

 

 

Raymond James Financial, Inc.

 

 

Charles Schwab Corporation Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

 

  

 

InvescoIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.

 

 

 

SEI Investments Co.

 

 

 Charles Schwab Corporation

Invesco Ltd.

Stifel Financial Corp

CME Group, Inc.

 

  

 

Legg Mason,

Stifel Financial

Eaton Vance Corp.

LPL Financial Holdings Inc.

 

 

 

TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation

 

 

First Republic Bank

 

  

 

Nasdaq Omx GroupLPL Financial Holdings, Inc.

 

 

 

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

 

Huntington Bank

Overview of 20162018 Named Executive Officer Compensation

The following chart provides a brief overview of the elements and objectives of our compensation program for our NEOs:

 

 Compensation Component

  Key Features

  

 Key Features

 Objective(s)

Base Salary

  

• Recognizes uniqueness of our organization and structure

• Reviewed annually to reflect skills, experience and performance

• Benchmarked with reference to peer group practices

• Set with reference to competitive levels

 

  

 Help attract and retain key leadership; aligned with salary levels associated with similar experience and skills in the market

 Provide competitive annual salaryrate of fixed pay

Annual Cash Incentive

Program

  

• Awards linked to goals forpre-tax income and specified key brokerage metrics

• Goals were approved by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the year

•     Target award opportunities set with reference to competitive levels

✓   Focus executives on achieving annual financial and strategic performance goals

✓   Reward for profitability

  Long-Term Equity
  Awards

•     PSUs generally vest and settle over three successive one-year performance periods based upon the achievement of earnings per share targets and achievement of key business initiatives

•     RSUs vest over three years based upon continued employment

• Target award opportunities set with reference to competitive levels

 

  

• Focus executives on achieving annual financial and strategic performance goals

• Reward for profitability and business performance

Long-Term Equity Awards

• PSUs granted in 2018 vest and settle over three successiveone-year performance periods based upon the achievement of EPS and ROE targets(1)

• RSUs vest over three years based upon continued service to the Company

• Target award opportunities set with reference to competitive levels

 Provide linkage to long-term stockholder value through a mix of performance and retention features

 Mitigate risk-taking

• Enhance executive ownership

Retirement Plan and
Other Benefits

  

• NEOs participate in our employee 401(k) plan and broad-based employee benefit plans

• Limited perquisites abovede minimisminimis value

 

  

 Encourage executives to save for retirement without the use of costly defined benefit plans or SERPs

 Limited perquisites avoid special executive benefits

 Compensation Component

 Key Features

 Objective(s)

Stock Ownership and

Retention

  

• Meaningful ownership requirements:

–  Executive Chairman & CEO: 5x6x base salary

–  NEOs: 3x4x base salary

• Retention of 50% ofafter-tax value of stock until guideline is met

 

  

 Require meaningful ownership of Company stock to ensure alignment with stockholder investment performance

Other Compensation
Components

  

• Clawback policy

• No single-trigger severance upon aChange-In-Control (“CIC”)

• No 280Ggross-ups on CIC benefits

• No excessive severance benefits

 

• No hedging/pledging involving Company securities

  

 Apply good compensation governance practices

(1)

Beginning with grants made in 2019, PSUs will vest and settle over a single three-year performance period based upon the achievement of a cumulative EPS target over the three-year period and return on the average ROE metric over the three-year period.

The total target compensation for 2016,2018 for our NEOs, including each element of compensation and individual changes in particular elements with respect to certain individuals from 2016,2018, are described below.

At least once a year, the Compensation Committee reviews “tally sheets” for each of the NEOs. These tally sheets are prepared by Pay Governance LLC, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, and quantify the elements of each NEO’s total compensation, including potential total annual compensation at different performance levels and the value of outstanding equity awards. The Compensation Committee did not recommend specific changes for NEOs’ fiscal 20162018 compensation in response tobased on this particular review, although it uses the tally sheet information as one data pointa resource when considering executive compensation matters.

The differences in pay among NEOs is a result of the Compensation Committee’s review of each NEO’s position and level of authority within the Company, experience, unique skill sets, significant achievements, competitive level of total compensation as compared with internal and external peers and/or individual negotiations in connection with accepting employment with the Company. The Compensation Committee also considers compensation of our NEOs in light of changes in roles and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee does not place a specific weight or emphasis on any of these factors.

20162018 Performance Metrics.Our business strategy for 20162018 was to continueaccelerate the growth of our core brokerage business and to improve the operating performance of the business while managing risks.generate robust earnings growth and healthy returns on capital. Accordingly, our incentive compensation program focused on these areas, but included a significant element associated with strategic and qualitative performance.

The cash bonuses awarded to NEOs for 20162018 performance were based 80%70% on the Company’spre-tax income for the year and 20%30% on the achievement of specified quantitative key brokerage metrics, including net new brokerage accounts, net new brokerage assets, margin contribution, daily average revenue trades, managed products and managed product.derivative mix. In addition, the Compensation Committee had discretion to adjust the overall cash bonus amountspool amount upward or downward by 10%20%. For purposes of the annual cash incentive plan,pre-tax income excludes all revenuecertain costs relating to regulatory, structural, legal and expense related to the OptionsHouse acquisition as well as other items, including, restructuringcompliance, executive severance, business disruption, strategic investments and transaction costs, the provision/benefitlegacy provision (benefit) for loan losses, and executive severance.losses.

The PSUs granted to NEOs other than Mr. Lawson, for 20162018 performance were based 50% on consolidated earnings per shareEPS targets relating to 20162018 and 50% on the achievement of certain key business initiatives during 2016. Mr. Lawson received a grant of PSUs in September 2016 upon his appointment as Executive Chairman that was based solely on the achievement of consolidated earnings per shareROE targets relating to 2016 due2018. In addition, the Compensation Committee had discretion to adjust the timing of the grant.overall performance factors downward by 20%.

For additional information regarding the annual cash bonuses paid to the NEOs in early 20172019 for 20162018 performance and the vesting and settlement of the PSUs that were granted with respect to 20162018 performance, please see pages 3429 through 35.

30 of this Proxy Statement.

Determination of Compensation Levels for our NEOs

Compensation of Our Former Executive Chairman.Mr. Lawson was appointed as our Executive Chairman on September 12, 2016. In connection with his appointment as our Executive Chairman, Mr. Lawson entered into an employment

agreement with us (the “Lawson Agreement”), which is scheduled to remainremained in effect until his service as our Executive Chairman ceased on December 31, 2018.2018 and Mr. Lawson resumed his position as ournon-executive Chair of the Board effective January 1, 2019.

The Lawson Agreement providesprovided that Mr. Lawson willwould receive an annual base salary of $850,000. The Lawson Agreement further providesprovided that Mr. Lawson was eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus for 2016 with a target of $500,000 and is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus for each of 2017 and 2018 with a target of $1,650,000 and$1,650,000. Mr. Lawson was also eligible to receive an annual equity performance bonuscompensation award for each of 2017 and 2018 with a target of $1,500,000 in the form of PSUs and $1,000,000 in the form of RSUs. Mr. Lawson also received a one-time equity award grant upon his appointment as Executive Chairman, consisting of PSUs with a grant date value of $455,000 that vested based on the achievement of consolidated earnings per share targets for 2016 and RSUs with a grant date value of $300,000 that vest ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.

Compensation of Our CEO.Mr. Roessner was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer on September 12, 2016. In connection with his appointment as our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Roessner entered into a newan employment agreement with us (theoriginally effective September 12, 2016 and later amended effective February 16, 2017, February 9, 2018 and February 8, 2019 (collectively, the “Roessner Agreement”), which. The Roessner Agreement is scheduled to remain in effect until December 31, 2019.

In 2018, Mr. Roessner’s annual base salary was $1,000,000, his annual cash performance bonus target was $2,000,000 and his annual equity compensation was $3,000,000 ($1,500,000 in the form of PSUs and $1,500,000 in the form of RSUs). For 2019, Mr. Roessner’s annual cash performance bonus target increased to $2,500,000, representing an increase of $500,000 over Mr. Roessner’s 2018 cash performance bonus target, and his annual equity compensation increased to $4,500,000 ($2,250,000 in the form of PSUs and $2,250,000 in the form of RSUs). The 2019 increases to Mr. Roessner’s annual cash performance bonus target and annual equity compensation were made to reflect his increased responsibilities in his role as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company following Mr. Lawson’s transition to serving as anon-executive Chair of the Board and to better align his compensation with his external peer group.

Compensation of Our Current Chief Financial Officer.In connection with Mr. Turner’s appointment on December 3, 2018 as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, the Compensation Committee approved an annual base salary of $500,000, an annual cash performance bonus target of $550,000 and an annual equity compensation award target of $1,050,000 (in the form of RSUs). In February 2019, prior to granting the RSUs to Mr. Turner, the Compensation Committee revised Mr. Turner’s equity compensation terms with respect to 2019 performance. As a result, Mr. Turner received annual equity compensation in the amount of $525,000 in the form of PSUs and is eligible to receive a grant of RSUs in early 2020 with a target value of $525,000 in respect of 2019 performance.

Compensation of Our Former Chief Financial Officer and Current Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer.Mr. Pizzi entered into an employment agreement with us effective February 14, 2017 (the “Original Pizzi Agreement”), which had an initial term that remained in effect until December 31, 2017 and thereafter automatically renewed for additionalone-year periods until it was replaced by a new employment agreement effective December 3, 2018 (the “New Pizzi Agreement”). The New Pizzi Agreement has an initial term to remain in effect until December 31, 2019 and thereafter automatically renews for additionalone-year periods unless terminated.

The RoessnerOriginal Pizzi Agreement providesprovided that Mr. Roessner willPizzi would receive an annual base salary of $850,000, which represented$600,000. During 2018, Mr. Pizzi’s annual cash performance bonus target was $1,300,000 and his annual equity compensation awards were $1,800,000 ($900,000 in the form of PSUs and $900,000 in the form of RSUs). In addition, upon his appointment as Chief Operating Officer on September 21, 2018, Mr. Pizzi was granted an increaseaward of $50,000 over his pre-appointment salary. RSUs having a grant date fair market value of $500,000.

The RoessnerNew Pizzi Agreement further provides that Mr. Roessner wasPizzi’s annual base salary is increased to $700,000 for 2019. Mr. Pizzi will be eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus for 20162019 with a target of $950,000, which represents$1,600,000, representing an increase of $400,000$300,000 over his 2015Mr. Pizzi’s 2018 cash performance bonus target, amount, and is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus for 2017 with a targetequity compensation awards from time to time at the discretion of $1,500,000 and anthe Company’s Board of Directors or its designee. For 2019, Mr. Pizzi’s annual equity performance bonus for 2017 with a target of $1,200,000compensation awards increased to $2,700,000 ($1,350,000 in the form of PSUs and $1,200,000$1,350,000 in the form of RSUs.RSUs). The 2019 increases to Mr. Roessner also received a one-time grant of RSUs upon his appointment as Chief Executive Officer with a grant date value of $1,000,000 that vests ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.

CompensationofOurChiefFinancial Officer.Mr. Pizzi received anPizzi’s annual base salary, of $600,000, an annual cash performance bonus target of $900,000 and an annual long-term equity award target of $1,400,000. Mr. Pizzi’s 2016 base salary represented an increase of $100,000 over his 2015 base salary and his 2016 annual cash performance target represented an increase of $50,000 over his 2015 target amount. Each of these increases for Mr. Pizzi wascompensation awards were made to reflect the increasing complexity of the financial regulatory environment and the resulting increased expectation as well as to better align his base salarycompensation with his internalexpanded role and external peer group.responsibilities as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer having, in addition to the finance functions, additional responsibilities over the operations and technology organizations within the Company.

Compensation of Our Chief Brokerage Officer.Mr. Curcio was appointed as our Former Chief Brokerage Officer on September 12, 2016. In connection with his appointment as our Chief Brokerage Officer, and Current Executive Vice President, Institutional and Vice Chairman of the Executive Committee.Mr. Curcio entered into an employment agreement with us effective February 15, 2017, as amended on March 7, 2019 (the “Curcio Agreement”), which has an initial term that expires onwill remain in effect until December 31, 2017.2019 and thereafter automatically renews for additionalone-year

periods unless terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Curcio Agreement. The Curcio Agreement provides that Mr. Curcio will receive an annual base salary of $600,000. The Curcio Agreement further provides$600,000, and that Mr. Curciohe is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus with aand equity compensation awards from time to time at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors or its designee. For 2018, Mr. Curcio’s annual cash performance bonus target of $1,200,000 (pro-rated to $357,500 for 2016)was $1,300,000 and commencing in 2017, anhis annual equity performance bonus with a target of $600,000compensation awards were $1,800,000 ($900,000 in the form of PSUs and $600,000$900,000 in the

form of RSUs. In connectionRSUs), which the Compensation Committee believes aligns his compensation with our acquisitionthat of OptionsHouse, Mr. Curcio received a one-time equity award grant consistinghis external peer group and recognizes his responsibility in leading the achievement of RSUs with a grant date value of $7,676,361, which approximatedrecord breaking metrics in the unvested portion of a profit sharing plan award from his prior employer. The award will vest ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.brokerage business.

Compensation of Our Chief Technology and Operations Officer. Mr. Foley received an annual base salary of $600,000, an annual cash performance bonus target of $600,000 and an annual long-term equity award target of $800,000.

Compensation of Our Former CEO. We paid Mr. Idzik severance in accordance with his employment agreement. Please see the “2016 Summary Compensation Table” set forth on page 39.

Base Salary

The annual base salary payable to each of our NEOs was set at a level that is reflective of the NEO’s position within the Company, experience, unique skills, internal peer and external peer group salaries, and individual negotiations undertaken during the hiring process. We strive to set base salaries for each of our NEOs at levels that are competitive with those paid to similarly situated executives at our peer companies. For 2018, the Compensation Committee made no significant changes to the base salaries of our NEOs.

Annual Cash Incentive Program

Annual Cash Incentive Awards. This cash-based element of compensation provides NEOs with an incentive and a reward for achieving meaningful near-term performance objectives that the Compensation Committee believes will lead to sustainable long-term performance. The Compensation Committee believes that it is important to rigorously assess achievement of our performance goals in determining whether and how much to pay in cash bonuses, but that it is also important to retain a degree of flexibility given the nature of our business. The target amount for each of our NEOs was set at a level that is reflective of each individual’s position within the Company, the importance of the various business areas or functions overseen to the Company’s strategy and success and each individual’s overall compensation.

Cash Awards for 20162018 Performance. In 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee established target cash bonus awards for each of our NEOs, in the amounts set forth in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table, for which the actual payout amounts would depend on the Compensation Committee’s review of our 20162018 performance against the performance criteria described below. In early 2017,2019, after reviewing both our financial and strategic performance, the Compensation Committee first approved a total bonus pool based on the factors described below and then determined appropriate individual payments. In determining the total bonus pool for 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee first determined that (i) thepre-tax income of the Company, which generally accounts for 80%70% of the bonus pool, was above budget; and (ii) the Company’s key brokerage metrics on an aggregate basis, which generally account for 20%30% of the bonus pool, and includeincludedout-performance with respect to generating net new brokerage accounts, net new brokerage assets, margin contribution and daily average revenue trades, and managed product, were slightly belowalso above budget. The achievement of thesepre-established performance criteria resulted in a bonus pool that was equal to 101%122.4% of the accrued target budget. The Compensation Committee then considered the Company’s accomplishment of various operational and strategic goals, the regulatory environment and enhanced regulatory expectations, market developments and the macro-economic environment and determined to exercise its pre-existingapplied negative discretion to increaseexclude the impact of the unbudgeted increases to the Federal Funds Rate reducing the bonus pool to a total of 111%115.3% of the accrued target budget.

Individual Cash Bonus Payouts. In determining the individual NEO payments from this bonus pool, the Board (with respect to the former Executive Chairman and CEO) and the Compensation Committee primarily considered which business areas were most successful and their importance to our strategy and successes, together with its view of leadership and effort by each individual officer and each individual’s overall compensation. As further described below, this resulted in each of Messrs. Lawson, Roessner, Turner, Pizzi, Curcio and FoleyCurcio receiving payments of $500,000, $1,100,000, $1,000,000, $500,000$1,650,000, $2,250,000, $550,000, $1,600,000 and $600,000,$1,500,000 respectively. In paying cash bonuses at or above target, the Board (with respect to the former Executive Chairman and CEO) and the Compensation Committee reiterated their desiresought to emphasize exceeding, not just meeting, goals forrecognize the year, to encourage focus on the improving financial performanceachievements of the Company while enhancing regulatory relationsduring the year and continue to make “target” bonuses difficultemphasize its objective to achieve at the executive level.pay for performance.

Given our strong financial and operational results in 2016,2018, all bonus payouts to NEOs who were eligible to receive a bonus with respect to 2018 were at or above target. However, the Board (with respect to the former Executive Chairman and CEO) and the Compensation Committee approved slightly different allocations (as a percentage of targets) due to the particular responsibilities and roles of each individual NEO. Mr. Lawson received 100% of target in recognition ofline with his substantial efforts in guiding

our successful management transition.employment agreement. Mr. Roessner received 116%113% of target in recognition of the Company’s strong financial results, his responsibility for all of the Company’s business units and functions, his leadership of the executive management team and positioning the Company for accelerated growth. Mr. Turner received 138% of target in recognition of his significant leadership efforts both before and after his appointment as our Chief Executive Officer, including reinvigorating the management team in line withcontributions to the Company’s finance functions, leadership and strategic goals,positioning, and his increased responsibilities as well as guiding our acquisitionCFO of OptionsHouse.the Company. Mr. Pizzi received 111%123% of target in recognition of his leadership in significant efforts that have contributed to the Company’s strategic plan and financial results, including the OptionsHouse acquisition, his continued strong leadership in light of the management transition and his execution against our ambitious capital plan.plan which included the completion of a $1 billion share repurchase program, the launch of the new $1 billion share repurchase program, the Company’s issuance of $420 million of 4.50% Senior Notes, the proceeds of which were used to redeem all of our outstanding TRUPs, and his leadership in completing the acquisitions of TCA and the Capital One accounts. Mr. Curcio received 140% of target (a $150,000 increase) in recognition of his ability in a short period of time since his appointment as Chief Brokerage Officer to successfully align the brokerage organization and focus the brokerage team on achieving growth goals. Mr. Foley received 100%115% of target in recognition of his leadership ofefforts in leading the Company’s technology developmentbrokerage business growth goals in a period during which the Company set numerous brokerage records and infrastructure and operations functions duringwas a key leader through a time at whichwhen the integration of OptionsHouse is critical to the success of our business strategy.Company achieved exceptional year-over-year growth.

Equity Compensation

Long-Term Incentive Compensation Practices for 20162018. We generally grant each of our NEOs aan equal mix of both performance-vesting PSUs and time-vesting RSUs. The Compensation Committee believes that awarding aan equal mix of time-vesting equity awards and performance-vesting equity awards based onpre-established goals achieves a balance in our equity-based compensation program and serves to further align the interests of our NEOs and our stockholders because the time-vesting RSU grants will continue to provide retention value, while the PSU grants help to further ensure a strongpay-for-performance alignment of our compensation program with stockholder interests and will further motivate our NEOs to strive to achieve our key business and strategic objectives. The target amount for each of our NEOs was set at a level that is reflective of each individual’s position within the Company, the importance of the various business areas or functions overseen to the Company’s strategy and success and each individual’s overall compensation.

PSU Grants Relating to 20162018 Performance.The PSUs that were granted to our NEOs in 20162018 are generally subject to vesting over three successiveone-year performance periods, withone-third of the PSUs relating to performance goals with respect to each of 2016, 20172018, 2019 and 2018.2020. In addition, Messrs. Lawson, Roessner, Pizzi and FoleyCurcio were each granted PSUs in 2015,2017, of which a total of 50% of whichone-third were subject to vesting over aone-year performance period relating to 2018 and Messrs. Roessner and Pizzi were each granted PSUs in 2016, of which a total ofone-third were subject to vesting over aone-year performance period relating to 2018 performance goals. Accordingly, for Messrs. Roessner Pizzi and Foley,Pizzi, a total of one-halfone-third of the PSUs granted in 2015 and2016, a total ofone-third of the PSUs granted in 20162017 and a total ofone-third of the PSUs granted in 2018 were subject to vesting based on performance goals relating to 2016.2018. For Messrs. Lawson and Curcio,one-third of the PSUs granted in 2017 andone-third of the PSUs granted in 2018 were subject to vesting based on performance goals relating to 2018. Due to the timing of Mr. Lawson received a one-time grant of PSUs upon hisTurner’s appointment as Executive Chairman in September 2016 that relates solely toChief Financial Officer, the 2016 performance period. Mr. CurcioCompensation Committee did not receiveapprove a grant of PSUs to Mr. Turner in 2016.respect of 2018 performance.

The performance goals that apply to the PSUs that were subject to vesting based on 20162018 performance (the “2016“2018 PSUs”) were established at the beginning of 2016. For all NEOs who received 2016 PSUs other than Mr. Lawson, one-half2018.One-half of the 20162018 PSUs were subject to the Company’s achievement in 20162018 of earnings per shareEPS targets, and the otherone-half of the 20162018 PSUs were subject to the Company’s achievement of certain key business initiatives that the Compensation Committee determined to have the highest strategic importance for the long-term performance of the Company and reinforce the Company’s critical priorities such as improving customer/colleague experience. For Mr. Lawson, 100% of the 2016 PSUs were subject to the Company’s achievement in 2016 of earnings per shareROE targets. In February 2017,2019, the Compensation Committee reviewed 20162018 performance relative to thepre-established goals and, based on that performance, confirmed that the Company had achieved approximately 120%156.0% of overall target performance with respect to the 2016 PSUs.2018 PSUs and applied negative discretion to exclude the impact of the unbudgeted increases to the Federal Funds Rate reducing the payout factor to 136.3%.

RSU Grants Made in 2016.2018

. The RSUs granted to our NEOs in 20162018 vest annually over three years, subject to the NEO’s continued employment.service to the Company.

RSU Grants Relating to Prior Performance. In February 2019, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Lawson an RSU award with a grant date fair market value of $1,000,000 in recognition of his leadership over the strategic direction of the Company during a period of invigorated growth, strong financial results and meaningful shareholder returns. In addition, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Pizzi an RSU award relating to 2018 performance with a grant date fair market value of $250,000. These RSU grants will vest ratably over three years, subject to each NEO’s continued service to the Company. Because these awards were made in 2019, SEC disclosure rules require that they not be reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table” or “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below. We are describing these grants in this “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” because they were made to Messrs. Roessner,Lawson and Pizzi and Foley in early 2016, we also made additional one-time grantsrecognition of RSUstheir significant contributions to each of Messrs. Lawson, Roessner and Curciothe Company’s success in September 2016, which are described in more detail above on page 33.

2018.

Equity Ownership GuidelinesPolicy for NEOs

The Compensation Committee believes that requiring significant stock ownership by our NEOs further aligns their interests with those of our stockholders. Under our stock ownership guidelines:Equity Ownership Policy in 2018:

 

The former Executive Chairman and the CEO arewere each expected to beneficially own shares of Companyour common stock with a market value equal to at least fivesix times his base salary (as adjusted from time to time).

Each of the other NEOs (as well as certain other employees of the Company) iswere expected to beneficially own shares of Company stockour Common Stock with a market value equal to at least threefour times his or her base salary (as adjusted from time to time).

 

AnyUntil an NEO not meeting(as well as certain other employees of the Company) has met this equity ownership thresholdguideline, he or she is required to hold 50% of allafter-tax shares remaining from the vesting of RSU and PSU awards and 50% of allafter-tax shares remaining from the exercise of vested stock options until such time as the NEO meets the applicable threshold.

For purposes of the Equity Ownership Policy described above, an NEO’s shareholdings include, in addition to shares held outright, any unvested RSUs that vest subject to the NEO’s continued service to the Company. The value of each RSU is treated the same as a share of the Company’s Common Stock.

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews compliance with these ownership guidelines.requirements. As of December 31, 2016,2018, all of our NEOs were in compliance with the ownership requirements.Equity Ownership Policy.

Recoupment Policy

Our recoupment policyIncentive Compensation Recoupment Policy is applicable to all NEOs and certain other employees. If the Compensation Committee determines that incentive compensation was overpaid as a result of a restatement of our reported financial results or any inaccurate data used to calculate such compensation, the Compensation Committee will review the cash bonus and long-term incentive plan awards granted, vested or accrued and determine the amount and kind of the overpayment. To the extent practicable, in the best interests of stockholders, and as permitted by applicable law, the Compensation Committee will seek to recover or cancel any such overpayments. The Compensation Committee may make determinations of overpayment at any time through the date the Company files its audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year that follows the year for which the inaccurate performance criteria were measured. However, if the Compensation Committee determines that any person purposefully provided inaccurate information or otherwise was culpable in the inaccuracy of the performance metrics, the Compensation Committee is entitled to determine that the overpayment with respect to such person is the entire amount of the bonus or other incentive payment or equity awarded for the applicable year, and without regard to when the event occurred.

Benefits in Connection with Termination of Employment Relating to Change in Control

As described in detail (including a quantification of potential benefits) under “Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control” below, we have entered into employment agreements with each of our NEOsMessrs. Lawson, Roessner, Pizzi and Curcio providing for severance benefits, including enhanced severance benefits in connection with certain qualifying terminations of employment in connection with a change in control, as well as certain other benefits outside of a change in control. We have also agreed to certain provisions with Mr. Turner providing for severance benefits in connection with certain qualifying terminations of employment in connection with a change in control. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews these arrangements and considers the costs and benefits, but believes they are appropriate to help alleviate any uncertainty and concern our NEOsthese individuals may have over being terminated and therefore help to ensure that our NEOsthey remain focused solely on their duties. The Compensation Committee balances the potential costs of these agreements againstarrangements with the need to retain our NEOsthese individuals in a market for top executive candidates that has become increasingly competitive. Our employment agreementsarrangements with our NEOsthese individuals do not provide for taxgross-ups, including with respect to any excise taxes resulting from Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.

Other Benefit Plans and Perquisites

We do not offer a defined benefit pension plan or “SERP” for our executives and only provide matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, which are made for NEOs in the same manner as for our other employees.

We offer anon-qualified deferred compensation plan for our NEOs, but the amounts in a participating executive’s plan account consist solely of the deferred compensation portion of his or her salary or cash incentive payments (as elected by the executive) and the market return on the deferred amounts, and we do not provide matching contributions or guaranteed returns. We have retained life insurance policies to support the payment of obligations under this plan.

Our philosophy is to provide minimal perquisites. We only provide NEOs with an “umbrella” liability insurance policy, providing for insurance coverage for the executive beyond what the executive has retained on his or her own behalf, with a cost per individual of less than $5,000 per year. Beyond this, there are no perquisites offered to our NEOs with anything other than ade minimisvalue except, as reported value.

Anti-Pledging and Hedging Policy

The Company’s policies prohibit executive officers and other employees from engaging in hedging transactions involving the “2016 Summary Compensation Table”,Company’s securities. This prohibition extends to short selling and trading in derivatives with respect to the Company’s securities. The Company’s securities arenon-marginable for paymentsemployees, including executive officers. The Equity Ownership Policy also prohibits executive officers from pledging shares of the Company’s common stock.

Tax Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places a limit of $1 million per year on the amount of compensation paid to Mr. Lawson in satisfactioncertain of our agreement to payexecutive officers that the Company may deduct for certain initial commuting and relocation services upon his appointment as Executive Chairman and limited spousal travel for Mr. Idzik.

Tax Considerationsfederal income tax purposes.

The tax deductibilityTax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted on December 22, 2017, substantially modified Section 162(m) and, among other things, eliminated the previously applicable performance-based exception to the $1 million deduction limit effective as of January 1, 2018. As a result, beginning in 2018, compensation paid to certain executive officers in excess of $1 million is one factor considered bygenerally nondeductible, whether or not it is performance-based.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act includes a transition rule under which the Compensation Committeechanges to Section 162(m) described above will not apply to compensation payable pursuant to a written binding contract that was in determiningeffect on November 2, 2017 and is not subsequently materially modified. However, in order to maintain flexibility in compensating executive compensation. Although some of our incentive plans are structured so that certain types of awards will qualify as deductible,officers in accordance with the Compensation Committee retains the flexibility to instead focus on the other considerations described in this “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.Analysis,

Compensation Committee Report

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act.

The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed this “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” set forth in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommendedwill not limit its actions with respect to executive compensation to preserve deductibility under Section 162(m) if the BoardCommittee determines that doing so is in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement.

Submitted by the Compensation Committeebest interests of the Board of Directors:Company.

Rebecca Saeger, Chair

Richard J. Carbone

James P. Healy

Kevin T. Kabat

Frederick W. Kanner

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

As discussed above, at various times during 2016, Ms. Saeger and Messrs. Carbone, Healy, Kabat and Kanner served on the Compensation Committee. None of these individuals was at any time during 2016, or at any other time, an officer or employee of the Company. No executive officer of the Company serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s Board or Compensation Committee.

Compensation Risk Assessment

During 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee considered the risk profile of our compensation programs, including a review of both executive andnon-executive compensation in a series of meetings with Pay Governance LLC, its independent compensation consultant, and members of our Legal, Human Resources and Risk teams. In particular, the Compensation Committee requested that Pay Governance LLC review all of our incentive plans. We may periodically adjust individual plans in response to this review to ensure that the plans do not pose a material risk to the Company. We believe the compensation program for our NEOs supports long-term growth and does not encourage excessive risk-taking because of the following features, as further described in this “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”:

 

The balance between fixed and variable pay;

 

Formulaic funding mechanisms and thresholds;

The aggregate bonus pool funding is capped;

 

We grant RSU awards with long-term vesting criteria, which we believe prevents a focus on a short-termrun-up in our stock price;

 

Earnings per share fundsEPS governs a portion of the PSU awards, meaning NEOs’ goals are directly aligned with stockholders and each must focus on all aspectsthe profitability of the Company’s objectivesCompany and the successful execution of our capital plan;

 

Our equity ownership guidelines,Equity Ownership Policy, as further described above, discouragediscourages the short-term gain our NEOs could realize if permitted to sell a large portion of their holdings;

 

Incentive compensation for NEOs depends on both balanced use of multiple performance metrics, includingpre-established financial performance and business objectives, to avoid placing an undue weight on any particular measure, and subjective assessments by the Compensation Committee of the quantitative and qualitative performance at the business and individual level;

Use of discretion is permitted to allow for the application of informed judgment rather than basing payouts solely on quantitative allocations;

Defined governance structure and policies to ensure proper protocols are in place for incentive compensation plan review and administration; and

 

We have implementedmaintain an incentive compensation recoupment policy.

Compensation Committee Report

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a recoupment policy for incentive compensation.document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act.

The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed this “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” set forth in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:

Rebecca Saeger, Chair

Richard J. Carbone

James P. Healy

Kevin T. Kabat

Joshua A. Weinreich

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

As discussed above, at various times during 2018, Ms. Saeger and Messrs. Carbone, Healy, Kabat, Kanner, Stern and Weinreich served on the Compensation Committee. None of these individuals was at any time during 2018, or at any other time, an officer or employee of the Company. No executive officer of the Company serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s Board or Compensation Committee.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

20162018 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table shows the annual and long-term compensation paid or accrued byto the Company to itsCompany’s named executive officers, which consist of its former Executive Chairman, its Chief Executive Officer, its Chief Financial Officer, the two other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as of December 31, 2016,its Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and its former Chief Executive Officer.Vice President, Institutional and Vice Chairman of the Executive Committee.

 

Name & Position

 Year  Salary  Stock
Awards (1)
  Option
Awards
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation (2)
  All Other
Compensation (3)
  Total  
Compensation  
 

Rodger A. Lawson(4)

  2016  $228,846  $904,983 (5)  $      —  $500,000  $328,773  $1,962,602 

Executive Chairman

       

Karl A. Roessner(6)

  2016  $813,462  $2,649,973  $  $1,100,000  $11,699  $4,575,134 

Chief Executive

Officer

  2015  $800,000  $2,349,962  $  $800,000  $8,183  $3,958,145 
  2014  $800,000  $899,984  $  $750,000  $8,458  $2,458,442 

Michael A. Pizzi

  2016  $584,615  $1,399,983  $  $1,000,000  $11,467  $2,996,065 

Chief Financial

Officer

  2015  $484,615  $1,599,989  $  $850,000  $7,994  $2,942,598 

Michael J, Curcio(7)

  2016  $184,231  $7,676,361 (8)  $  $875,184  $2,000  $8,737,776 

Chief Brokerage Officer

       
       

Michael E. Foley(9)

  2016  $600,000  $799,964  $  $600,000  $11,570  $2,011,534 

Chief Technology and Operations Officer

  2015  $592,308  $1,399,984  $  $700,000  $8,300  $2,700,592 
  2014  $535,000  $549,980  $  $600,000  $7,872  $1,692,852 

Paul T. Idzik(10)

  2016  $734,615  $3,999,959  $  $  $6,174,602  $10,909,176 

Former Chief

Executive Officer

  2015  $1,000,000  $  $  $4,500,000  $62,029  $5,562,029 
  2014  $1,000,000  $  $  $4,250,000  $8,458  $5,258,458 

 Name & Position

   Year     Salary   Stock
 Awards (1) 
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
  Compensation (2)  
   All Other
Compensation (3)
   Total
 Compensation 
 

 

 Rodger A. Lawson(4)

  2018     $    850,000     $  2,499,943   $1,650,000     $23,420     $  5,023,363  

Former Executive Chairman

  2017     $850,000     $2,499,935   $1,650,000     $11,865     $5,011,800  
 

 

 

 

 

2016 

 

 

 

 

   $

 

228,846 

 

 

 

   $

 

904,983

 

 

 

  $

 

500,000 

 

 

 

   $

 

    328,773 

 

 

 

   $

 

1,962,602 

 

 

 

 

 Karl A. Roessner(5)

 

 

 

 

2018 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

976,923 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

2,999,970

 

 

 

 

 $

 

      2,250,000 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

26,205 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

6,253,098 

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

  2017     $850,000     $2,399,991   $2,500,000     $12,608     $5,762,599  
 

 

 

 

 

2016 

 

 

 

 

   $

 

813,462 

 

 

 

   $

 

2,649,973

 

 

 

  $

 

1,100,000 

 

 

 

   $

 

11,699 

 

 

 

   $

 

4,575,134 

 

 

 

 

 Chad E. Turner(6)

 

 

 

 

2018 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

307,692 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

349,975

 

 

 

 

 $

 

550,000 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

16,755 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

1,224,422 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

          

 

 Michael A. Pizzi

 

 

 

 

2018 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

600,000 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

2,499,894

 

 

 

 

 $

 

1,600,000 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

23,523 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

4,723,417 

 

 

Executive Vice President,

  2017     $600,000     $1,599,947   $1,600,000     $12,390     $3,812,337  

Chief Operating Officer

 

 

 

 

 

2016 

 

 

 

 

   $

 

584,615 

 

 

 

   $

 

1,399,983

 

 

 

  $

 

1,000,000 

 

 

 

   $

 

11,467 

 

 

 

   $

 

2,996,065 

 

 

 

 

 Michael J. Curcio

 

 

 

 

2018 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

600,000 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

1,999,915

 

 

 

 

 $

 

1,500,000 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

33,582 

 

 

  

 

 $

 

4,133,497 

 

 

Executive Vice President,

Institutional and Vice

Chairman of the

Executive Committee

  2017     $576,923     $1,599,947   $1,600,000     $12,520     $3,789,390  
 

 

 

 

2016 

 

 

   $184,231     $7,676,361 (7)    $875,184     $2,000     $8,737,776  
          
          

 

(1)

Amounts reported in this column constitute the aggregate grant date fair value of each award calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For more information regarding the assumptions used in determining the fair value of awards, please refer toNote 1-Organization, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policieswithin Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the SEC on February 22, 2017. For grants made in 2016,2018, the stock awards reported in this column were in the amounts set forth in the “Grants of Plan Based Awards” table below. The fair market value of the Common Stock (based on the average of the high and low sale prices) was $23.0750$48.655 per share for awards granted on February 5, 2016, $25.29 per share for awards granted on May 13, 20169, 2018 and $26.6950$55.51 per share for awards granted on September 12, 2016.21, 2018. The grant date fair value of PSUs included in this column assumes a payout at the target performance level. For additional information, including PSU awards at target and maximum performance on a per executive basis, refer to the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table,” below.

 

(2)

Non-equity incentive plan compensation reported for the applicable year was based on performance in that year, but paid in February of the following year.

 

(3)

The amounts set forth in this column for 20162018 represent, as applicable, (i) Company contributions to the Company’s 401(k) plan;plan in the amount of $13,750 for each NEO, (ii) the cost of Company-provided umbrella liability insurance;insurance, and (iii) for Mr. Lawson, certain commuting and relocation costs and $267,500 in board fees paid to him for service as Non-Executive Chairman of the Company from January 1, 2016 to September 12, 2016; and (iv) for Mr. Idzik, cash severance payments of $6,123,541, continued medical coverage with a value of $40,078 and spousal travel.DEUs awarded in connection with each NEO’s unvested RSUs. In accordance with SEC rules, the compensation described in this table does not include medical, disability or group life insurance received by the NEOs that are available generally to all salaried employees of the Company.

 

(4)

Mr. Lawson served as the Company’sNon-Executive Chairman in 2016 until he was appointed as Executive Chairman of the Company effective September 12, 2016. Mr. Lawson served as the Company’s Executive Chairman until December 31, 2018.

 

(5)

The amount set forth for Mr. Lawson represents (i) DSUs having an aggregate grant date value of $149,995 that were granted to him on May 13, 2016 for his annual retainer for service as a Non-Executive Chairman of the Company, and (ii) RSUs and PSUs having an aggregate grant date value of $754,988 that were granted to him upon his appointment as Executive Chairman of the Company on September 12, 2016. Each aggregate grant date value amount was calculated in accordance with Footnote 1 to this table.

(6)

Mr. Roessner served as the Company’s General Counsel in years 2014, 2015 and 2016 until he was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective September 12, 2016.

 

(7)(6)

Mr. CurcioTurner was appointed as Chief BrokerageFinancial Officer of the Company effective September 12, 2016 in connection with the Company’s acquisition of OptionsHouse. Accordingly, all amounts reported in this table for Mr. Curcio reflect compensation paid for Mr. Curcio’s employment with the Company from September 12, 2016 to December 31, 2016, except for amounts reported under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” which consist of (i) a cash bonus of $500,000 payable for his service as our Chief Brokerage Officer effective on September 12, 2016 and (ii) a cash bonus of $375,184 payable for his service with OptionsHouse prior to September 12, 2016.3, 2018.

 

(8)(7)

The amount set forth in this column for year 2016 represents, in connection with our acquisition of OptionsHouse, aone-time equity award grant to Mr. Curcio consisting of RSUs, which approximated the unvested portion of a profit sharing plan award from his prior employer. The award will vestvests ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.

(9)

Mr. Foley served as the Company’s Chief Administrative Officer in years 2014, 2015 and 2016 until he was appointed as Chief Technology and Operations Officer effective September 12, 2016.

(10)

Mr. Idzik’s employment with the Company terminated effective September 12, 2016.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

 

     Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
(Dollars expressed in thousands
and rounded to
the nearest thousand) (1)
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
(Number of Shares)
  All  Other
Stock
Awards:
Number  of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
  Grant
Date  Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards
($) (2)
 

Name

 Grant
Date
  Threshold
($) (3)
  Target
($) (3)
  Maximum
($) (3)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#) (4)
   

Rodger A. Lawson

  5/13/2016   250   500   750          5,931   149,995   
  9/12/2016       17,044   34,088   11,238   754,988   

Karl A. Roessner

  2/5/2016   475   950   1,425    26,002   52,004   45,503   1,649,978   
  9/12/2016         37,460   999,995   

Michael A. Pizzi

  2/5/2016   450   900   1,350    14,301   28,602   46,370   1,399,983   

Michael J. Curcio

  9/12/2016   179   357   536          287,558   7,676,361   

Michael E. Foley

  2/5/2016   300   600   900    13,867   27,734   20,801   799,964   

Paul T. Idzik

  2/5/2016             86,673   173,346   86,673   3,999,959   
     Estimated Future Payouts
UnderNon-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
(Dollars expressed in thousands
and rounded to
the nearest thousand) (1)
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
(Number of Shares)
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
  Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards
($) (2)
 

  Name

 Grant
        Date        
  

 

    Threshold    
($) (3)

      Target    
($) (3)
      Maximum    
($) (3)
      Threshold    
(#)
      Target    
(#)
      Maximum    
(#) (4)
 

 

Rodger A.
Lawson

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

825 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,650 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,475 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

30,829 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61,658 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  20,552

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    2,499,943 

 

 

 

 

         

 

Karl A.
Roessner

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,000 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

30,829 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61,658 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,829

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,999,970 

 

 

 

 

         

 

Chad E.
Turner

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

400 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

600 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,193

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

349,975 

 

 

 

 

         

 

Michael A.
Pizzi

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

650 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,300 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,950 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

18,497 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,994 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,799,943 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

4,110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

199,972 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9/21/2018 

 

 

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

9,007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

499,979 

 

 

 

 

         

 

Michael J.
Curcio

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

650 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,300 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,950 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

18,497 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,994 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,799,943 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

4,110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

199,972 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Amounts listed in these columns do not represent amounts actually paid or that may be paid in the future. Rather, these amounts are the target award opportunities that were established under the Company’snon-equity compensation plan for 20162018 as discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” above. Payments actually made for these opportunities in February 20172019 for 20162018 performance are listed in the “2016“2018 Summary Compensation Table” above under the “Non-Equity“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column for 2016.2018.

 

(2)

Amounts reported in this column constitute the aggregate grant date fair value of each award calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of PSUs included in this column assumes a payout at the target performance level. These amounts are also disclosed in the “Stock Awards” column in the “2016“2018 Summary Compensation Table” above.

 

(3)

The Company’s practice under its current plan is to pay its NEOs anon-equity incentive award in an amount that is at least equal to the threshold amount if performance goals are achieved but does not exceed the maximum amount.

 

(4)

The grant date fair value of the PSUs assuming the maximum level of performance is achieved is equal to $909,979$2,999,970 for Mr.each of Messrs. Lawson $1,199,992and Roessner, and $1,799,943 for Mr. Roessner, $659,991 for Mr.each of Messrs. Pizzi $639,962 for Mr. Foley and $3,999,959 for Mr. Idzik.Curcio.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END

 

  Option Awards   Stock Awards  Option Awards Stock Awards 

Name

  Option
Awards
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)
   Option
Exercise
Price
($)
   Option
Expiration
Date
   Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested

(#)(1)
   Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock

That Have
Not Vested
($)(2)
   Grant
Date
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,

Units
or Other
Rights
That Have

Not
Vested(3)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested

($)(2)
  Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
  Unexercised  
Options
(#)
 Option
 Exercise 
Price
($)
 Option
  Expiration  
Date
   Number of  
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested
(#) (1)
 Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
  Not Vested  
($) (2)
 Grant
Date
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
 Number of 
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That Have
Not
Vested (3)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($) (2)
 

Rodger A. Lawson

                    

 

 

 

 

3,756 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

164,813 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9/12/2016 

 

 

 

 

  
    

 

 

 

 

19,114 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

838,722 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/3/2017 

 

 

 

 

  
    

 

 

 

 

20,607 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

904,235 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

  
         5,931    205,509    5/13/2016           

 

 

 

 

2/3/2017 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,672 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,258,127 

 

 

 

 

         11,238    389,397    9/12/2016           

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,912 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,356,419 

 

 

 

 

             9/12/2016    17,044    590,575           

Karl A. Roessner

                    

 

 

 

 

15,208 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

667,327 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/5/2016 

 

 

 

 

  
         17,407    603,153    2/6/2013         

 

 

 

 

12,519 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

549,334 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9/12/2016 

 

 

 

 

  
         14,877    515,488    2/7/2014         

 

 

 

 

22,938 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,006,519 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/3/2017 

 

 

 

 

  
         31,106    1,077,823    2/6/2015         

 

 

 

 

30,912 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,356,419 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

  
         20,867    723,042    2/6/2015           

 

 

 

 

2/5/2016 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,690 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

381,317 

 

 

 

 

         45,503    1,576,679    2/5/2016           

 

 

 

 

2/3/2017 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,938 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,006,519 

 

 

 

 

         37,460    1,297,989    9/12/2016           

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,912 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,356,419 

 

 

 

 

        

Chad E. Turner

    

 

 

 

 

2,171 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

95,263 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/5/2016 

 

 

 

 

  
             2/6/2015    6,707    232,398       

 

 

 

 

2,866 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

125,760 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/3/2017 

 

 

 

 

  
             2/5/2016    26,002    900,969       

 

 

 

 

3,822 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

167,709 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/3/2017 

 

 

 

 

  
   3,712    14.60    2/11/2017               

 

 

 

 

7,212 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

316,463 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

  
   4,837    17.58    2/10/2018                   

Michael A. Pizzi

                    

 

 

 

 

15,497 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

680,008 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/5/2016 

 

 

 

 

  
         9,161    317,429    2/6/2013         

 

 

 

 

15,291 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

670,969 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/3/2017 

 

 

 

 

  
         6,942    240,540    2/7/2014         

 

 

 

 

18,547 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

813,842 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

  
         19,442    673,665    2/6/2015         

 

 

 

 

4,121 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

180,829 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

  
         15,423    534,407    2/6/2015         

 

 

 

 

9,031 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

396,280 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9/21/2018 

 

 

 

 

  
         46,370    1,606,721    2/5/2016           

 

 

 

 

2/5/2016 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,779 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

209,703 

 

 

 

 

             2/6/2015    4,958    171,795         

 

 

 

 

2/3/2017 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,291 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

670,969 

 

 

 

 

             2/5/2016    14,301    495,530         

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,547 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

813,842 

 

 

 

 

   11,249    14.60    2/11/2017                   
   11,727    17.58    2/10/2018           

Michael J. Curcio

                    

 

 

 

 

96,112 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,217,395 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9/12/2016 

 

 

 

 

  
         287,558    9,963,885    9/12/2016     

Michael E. Foley

                
         9,091    315,003    2/7/2014         

 

 

 

 

15,291 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

670,969 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/3/2017 

 

 

 

 

  
         18,145    628,724    2/6/2015         

 

 

 

 

18,547 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

813,842 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

  
         12,702    440,124    2/6/2015         

 

 

 

 

4,121 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

180,829 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

  
         20,801    720,755    2/5/2016           

 

 

 

 

2/3/2017 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,291 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

670,969 

 

 

 

 

             2/6/2015    4,082    141,441         

 

 

 

 

2/9/2018 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,547 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

813,842 

 

 

 

 

             2/5/2016    13,867    480,492   

Paul T. Idzik (4)

                
         86,673    3,003,219    2/5/2016     
             2/5/2016    20,208    700,207   

 

(1)

All unvested restricted stock and RSU awards, granted prior to 2014 vest equally on an annual basis over a four-year period measured from the date of grant. All unvested restricted stock and RSU awards granted in 2014 or afterincluding DEUs awarded with respect thereto, vest equally on an annual basis over a three-year period measured from the original date of grant.grant of the underlying award.

 

(2)

The market value of unvested and unearned stock awards, including DEUs awarded with respect thereto, is based on an assumed price of $34.65$43.88 per share, which was the closing price of our Common Stock on December 30, 2016, which was the last trading day in 2016.31, 2018.

 

(3)

Represents the number of shares the NEO may receive under PSU awards, including DEUs that would be awarded with respect thereto, assuming achievement of the applicable performance measures at the target performance level. The PSU awards granted in 20152016 for all NEOs vest and settle at the conclusion of two threeone-year performance periods ending on December 31 of each of 2015 and 2016, respectively. The PSU awards granted in 2016 for all NEOs other than Mr. Lawson vest and settle at the conclusion of three one-year performance periods ending on December 31 of each of 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively. The PSU awardawards granted to Mr. Lawson in 2016 relate solely to2017 for all NEOs vest and settle at the conclusion of threeone-yearperformance periodperiods ending on December 31 2016.of each of 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The PSU awards granted in 2018 for all NEOs vest and settle at the conclusion of threeone-year performance periods ending on December 31of each of 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively.

(4)

The awards listed for Mr. Idzik remain subject to vesting on the regularly scheduled vesting dates subject to his continued compliance with certain post-termination covenants.

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table presents information regarding the exercise of stock options during 20162018 by our NEOs and vesting of other stock awards held by our NEOs during 2016:2018:

 

  Option Awards   Stock Awards  Option Awards Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
   Value
Realized  on

Exercise ($) (1)
   Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
     Value Realized on  
Vesting
($)(1)
  

 

  Number of Shares  

Acquired on
Exercise (#) (1)

 Value
Realized on
    Exercise ($) (2)    
   Number of Shares  
Acquired on
Vesting (#) (1)
   Value Realized on  
Vesting
($) (2)
 

Rodger A. Lawson (2)

           5,173    128,368  

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,370 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,067,797 

 

 

 

 

Karl A. Roessner

           90,266    2,031,452  

 

 

 

 

4,837 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

166,226 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101,773 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,285,422 

 

 

 

 

Chad E. Turner

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,800 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

355,190 

 

 

 

 

Michael A. Pizzi

   3,078    37,301    51,891    1,171,064  

 

 

 

 

11,727 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

404,151 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63,130 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,260,377 

 

 

 

 

Michael J. Curcio

                 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

117,395 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,292,561 

 

 

 

 

Michael E. Foley

           29,823    688,166 

Paul T. Idzik

           437,956    11,442,170 

 

(1)

Number of Shares acquired upon vesting of our Stock Awards includes DEUs awarded with respect thereto.

(2)

Aggregate value realized upon vesting of our Stock Awards, including DEUs awarded with respect thereto, is based on the fair market value of our Common Stock (using the average of the high and low sale prices) on the vesting date. With respect to Option Awards, the value realized is calculated by subtracting the exercise price from the sale price.

(2)

The vested Stock Award listed in this table for Mr. Lawson consists of DSUs granted to Mr. Lawson during his service as our Non-Executive Chairman. Delivery of shares of our Common Stock will occur at a later date upon settlement of the DSUs following Mr. Lawson’s departure from Board service.

PENSION BENEFITS AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION

We do not offer a defined benefit retirement plan to any of our employees, including our NEOs.

Although we have anon-qualified deferred compensation plan, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2018, none of our NEOs elected to contribute to this plan and there were no aggregate withdrawals, distributions or balances as of December 31, 20162018 with respect to any of our NEOs.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS ON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Agreements with Named Executive Officers

Under the terms of their employment agreements and equity award agreements in effect as of December 31, 2016,2018, each NEO (other than Messrs. Lawson and Turner) is entitled to severance benefits in the event of (i) an involuntary termination of the NEO’s employment without “Cause” (as defined in the employment agreement) or (ii) a voluntary termination of the NEO’s employment due to an event of “Good Reason,” in each case subject to the NEO signing a release of claims in favor of the Company. The term “Good Reason” is defined in the applicable agreement, but generally includes such events as a material decrease in compensation; a material, adverse change in the NEO’s title, authority, responsibilities or duties; relocation; or a material breach by the Company of the agreement. If the termination occurs in anticipation of, or within two years following, a change in control (which we refer to as a “CIC Termination” below), the severance benefits are increased, as described below.

The severance benefits for our NEOs (other than for our Executive Chairman)Messrs. Lawson and Turner) include:

 

A lump sum payment equal to one times (or two times upon a CIC Termination) the sum of the NEO’s base salary and target cash bonus;

 

Apro-rated annual cash bonus for the year of the termination based on our actual achievement of the applicable performance objectives for the full year;

ContinuedReimbursement of medical coverage for up to 12 months following termination of employment (or up to 24 months following a CIC Termination) for applicable NEOs except for our CEO;

 

Continued medical coverage for up to 24 months following termination of employment or following a CIC Termination for our CEO;

 

Continued vesting of time-based equity awards upon a termination that does not qualify as a CIC Termination, subject to the NEO’s compliance with certain covenants;

 

Immediate vesting of time-based equity awards upon a CIC Termination;

 

VestingContinued vesting and settlement of a pro-rated portion ofthen outstanding and not vested PSUs for the 2016 performance period at the Company’s actual performance level upon a termination that does not qualify as a CIC Termination; and

 

Vesting and settlement of PSUs for the 2016, 20172018, 2019 and 20182020 performance periods at the100% of respective target performance level upon a CIC Termination.

TheUnder the terms of certain change in control provisions agreed upon between us and Mr. Turner, his severance benefits for our Executive Chairmanin the case of a CIC Termination without Cause, including an event of Good Reason (as defined above) include:

 

Upon a termination other than a CIC Termination:A lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of the Mr. Turner’s base salary and target cash bonus;

 

¡

A lump sum payment equal to the base salary payable to the Executive Chairman during the period commencing on the date of termination and ending on December 31, 2018;

¡

Continued payment of the cash bonuses that would have been payable to the Executive Chairman for the year of termination and each subsequent year through and including 2018 based on our actual achievement of the applicable performance objectives for each year;

¡

Continued medical coverage through December 31, 2018;

¡

Continued vesting of time-based equity awards, subject to the Executive Chairman’s compliance with certain covenants; and

¡

Vesting and settlement of a pro-rated portion of PSUs for the 2016 performance period at the Company’s actual performance level.

Upon a CIC Termination:Apro-rated annual cash bonus for the year of the termination based on our actual achievement of the applicable performance objectives for the full year;

 

¡

A lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of the Executive Chairman’s annual base salary and annual target cash bonus;

Reimbursement of medical coverage for up to 24 months following termination of employment; and

 

¡

A pro-rated annual cash bonus for the year of the termination based on our actual achievement of the applicable performance objectives for the full year;

Immediate vesting of time-based equity awards.

As noted above, Mr. Lawson served as the Company’s Executive Chairman pursuant to the Lawson Agreement until December 31, 2018. Mr. Lawson did not receive any severance benefits.

¡

Continued medical coverage for 24 months following termination of employment;

¡

Immediate vesting of time-based equity awards; and

¡

Vesting and settlement of PSUs for the 2016 performance period at the target performance level.

In addition, under the employment agreements with our NEOs and our standard forms of equity award agreements for awards granted in 2016,2018, the NEOs, (oror their estate, as applicable)applicable, are entitled to receive the accelerated vesting of certain equity awards in the event of the NEO’s death or disability. Under their employment agreements, our NEOs (other than Messrs. Lawson and Turner) are also entitled to the payment of apro-rata portion of the NEO’s annual cash bonus in the event of the NEO’s death or disability.

The following table shows the estimated value of benefits under each of the above scenarios, assuming the specified event occurred on December 31, 2016.2018.

 

Name    Accelerated Vesting       
Event of Termination  Cash Payment of Equity(1) Benefits (2)   Total(3) 

Name

Event of Termination

 Cash Payment Accelerated Vesting
of Equity (1)
   Benefits (2) Total(3) 

Rodger A. Lawson(4)

        $—    $—     $—    $—  

Karl A. Roessner

     

Involuntary Termination

  $5,500,000 (4)  $1,185,480  $   $6,685,480     $          5,000,000  (5)    $6,323,854     $33,614    $11,357,468  

CIC Termination

  $5,500,000 (5)  $1,185,480  $   $6,685,480     $8,000,000  (6)    $6,323,854     $33,614    $          14,357,468  

Death/Disability

  $500,000 (6)  $1,185,480  $   $1,685,480     $2,000,000  (7)    $6,323,854     $—    $8,323,854  

Karl A. Roessner

      

Chad E. Turner

     

Involuntary Termination(8)

  $—     $—     $—    $—  

CIC Termination

  $2,200,000  (6)    $705,195     $34,497    $2,939,692  

Death/Disability

  $—     $705,195     $—    $705,195  

Michael A. Pizzi

     

Involuntary Termination

  $3,300,000 (4)  $6,326,894  $39,292   $9,666,186     $3,200,000  (5)    $4,436,444     $17,668    $7,654,112  

CIC Termination

  $5,650,000 (5)  $6,927,540  $39,292   $12,616,832     $5,100,000  (6)    $4,436,444     $35,337    $9,571,781  

Death/Disability

  $950,000 (6)  $6,326,894  $   $7,276,894     $1,300,000  (7)    $4,436,444     $—    $5,736,444  

Michael A. Pizzi

      

Michael J. Curcio

     

Involuntary Termination

  $2,400,000 (4)  $3,709,733  $20,158   $6,129,891     $3,200,000  (5)    $7,367,847     $16,748    $10,584,595  

CIC Termination

  $3,900,000 (5)  $4,040,086  $40,316   $7,980,402     $5,100,000  (6)    $7,367,847     $          33,497    $12,501,344  

Death/Disability

  $900,000 (6)  $3,709,733  $   $4,609,733     $1,300,000  (7)    $          7,367,847     $—    $8,667,847  

Michael J. Curcio

      

Involuntary Termination

  $2,157,500 (4)  $9,963,885  $7,301   $12,128,686   

CIC Termination

  $3,957,500 (5)  $9,963,885  $14,602   $13,935,987   

Death/Disability

  $357,500 (6)  $9,963,885  $   $10,321,385   

Michael E. Foley

      

Involuntary Termination

  $1,800,000 (4)  $2,406,235  $20,158   $4,226,393   

CIC Termination

  $3,000,000 (5)  $2,726,574  $40,316   $5,766,890   

Death/Disability

  $600,000 (6)  $2,406,235      $3,006,235   

Paul T. Idzik(7)

  $6,123,541  $7,009,560 (8)  $40,078   $13,173,179   

 

(1)

The market value of any equity awards that would vest on each event is based on an assumed price of $34.65$43.88 per share, which was the closing price of our Common Stock on December 30, 2016,31, 2018, which was the last trading day in 2016.2018. Amounts included in this column reflect the value of time-based equity awards and PSUs which would: (a) immediately vest upon a CIC Termination or Death/Disability; and (b) continue to vest subject to compliance with certain covenants upon an involuntary termination.

(2)

Consists of continued medical coverage for 12 months following involuntary termination for Messrs. Pizzi and Curcio and 24 months following a CIC Termination for Messrs. Turner, Pizzi Curcio and Foley,Curcio, and continued medical coverage for 24 months following involuntary termination or a CIC Termination for Mr. Roessner. Assumes a per month cost of $1,637$1,401 for Mr. Roessner, $1,680$1,437 for Messrs.Mr. Turner, $1,472 for Mr. Pizzi and Foley and $608$1,396 for Mr. Curcio. Mr. Lawson did not elect medical coverage in 2016.

 

(3)

Amounts listed in this column may be subject to reduction under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

(4)

Mr. Lawson did not receive any severance payments or benefits as a result of the conclusion of his service as Executive Chairman effective December 31, 2018.

(5)

For Messrs. Roessner, Pizzi, Curcio and Foley,Curcio, represents one times the sum of salary and target bonus, pluspro-rated annual cash bonus for the year of termination. For Mr. Lawson, represents (i) base salary through December 31, 2018, and (ii) continued payment of annual cash bonuses through and including 2018, assuming achievement of performance goals at the target level for 2017 and 2018 bonuses.

(5)

For Messrs. Lawson, Roessner, Pizzi, Curcio and Foley, represents two times the sum of salary and target bonus, plus pro-rated annual cash bonus for the year of termination.

 

(6)

For Messrs. Roessner, Turner, Pizzi, and Curcio, represents two times the sum of salary and target bonus, pluspro-rated annual cash bonus for the year of termination.

(7)

Consists ofpro-rated target cash bonus for the year of termination. Because this scenario presumes the triggering event occurred on December 31, 2016,2018, thepro-rated value is 100% of the target bonus for 2016.2018.

 

(7)(8)

All amounts reported forIn accordance with SEC rules, the table does not include severance benefits to which Mr. Idzik reflect actual amounts paid or to be paid as a result of his termination of employment effective September 12, 2016.

(8)

Includes accelerated vesting of certain RSU awards and the settlement of 2016 PSUs due to Mr. Idzik in connection with his termination. The market value of accelerated RSUsTurner is entitled based on a valueseverance plan that is generally available to all salaried employees of $28.1476 per share, which was the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of acceleration. The market value of PSUs is based on a value of $34.97 per share, which was the fair market value of our Common Stock on the settlement date.Company.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2016,2018, regarding our equity compensation plans:

 

  Number of Securities
To Be Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights(1)
   Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and
Rights(2)
   Number of Securities
 Remaining Available for 
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans
     Number of Securities  
To Be Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights (1)
 Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and
Rights (2) 
 Number of Securities
  Remaining Available for  
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation

Plans
 

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders

   3,335,543   $37.57    10,024,855     

 

 

 

 

2,221,490 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

 

14.35 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,970,839 

 

 

 

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders

           —     

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   3,335,543   $37.57    10,024,855     

 

 

 

 

2,221,490 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

14.35 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,970,839 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Includes stock options, RSUs, and PSUs (at maximum performance level) but not restricted shares.

(2)

Excludes RSUs, PSUs and restricted stock, which have no exercise price.

PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, the Company determined that the annual total compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer in respect of 2018 was approximately 61 times the annual total compensation of the median employee (other than our Chief Executive Officer) in respect of 2018.

For purposes of the pay ratio calculation, as there has been no change in the employee population or compensation arrangements that would significantly impact the required pay ratio disclosure and there has not been a significant change in the original median employee’s circumstances, we have used the same median employee identified last year. As permitted by Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, this year we excluded 181 individuals that became employees as a result of our acquisition of TCA during 2018 because their legacy compensation arrangements, which are no longer in place, differed from the remainder of our employee population.

We originally identified the median employee by examining the 2017 total compensation for all individuals, excluding our Chief Executive Officer, who were employed by us on October 1, 2017. We included all employees, whether employed on a full-time or part-time basis, excluding contingent and outsourced employees, consultants and interns. To calculate the annual total compensation for each employee we included all compensation earned by the employee for 2017, including, salary, bonus, equity compensation and Company 401(k) contribution, as applicable. During 2018, the median employee’s annual total compensation (other than our Chief Executive Officer) was $102,732. The annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer is set forth in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table on page 34 of this Proxy Statement under the heading “Total Compensation.”

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Policies and Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions

The Board has formally adopted a policy with respect to related party transactions that provides the framework under which such transactions are reviewed, approved or ratified. The policy applies to any transaction in which (1) the Company is a participant, (2) any related party (as defined in our policy, which includes the Company’s directors, executive officers, andany nominee to become a director of the Company, stockholders owning more than 5% of any class of our voting securities)securities, any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, and any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a general partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 10% or greater beneficial ownership interest) has or will have a direct or indirect material interest and (3) the amount involved exceeds $120,000, but excludes any transaction that does not require disclosure under Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K. The Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing, approving and ratifying any related party transaction. The Governance Committee intends to approve only those related party transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The policy is available, without charge, from our Corporate Secretary and on the Investor Relations section of our website atabout.etrade.com in thesub-section titled “Corporate Governance” section.Governance.”

There were no related party transactions identified for 2016.2018.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not involved in any legal proceedings in which any director or executive officer is adverse to the Company. Certain lawsuits we are involved in are discussed underNote21-Commitments, Contingencies and Other Regulatory Matterswithin Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on February 22, 2017 with the SEC.Report.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company with the SEC. Officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of any class of the Company’s equity securities are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

Based solely upon review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, the Company believes that all of our directors, executive officers and owners of more than 10% of our Common Stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during 2016.2018.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Stockholder Proposals to Be Considered for Inclusion in the Company’s 20182020 Proxy Materials. Stockholders may submit proposals for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in accordance with Exchange Act Rule14a-8. To be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 20182020 Annual Meeting, stockholder proposals must be received no later than November 29, 201727, 2019 at the Company’s offices located at Ballston Tower, 671 North Glebe Road, 12th15th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203-2120, Attention: Corporate Secretary, and must comply with all provisions of Rule14a-8. If we do not receive a stockholder proposal by the deadline described above, the proposal We may be excludedexclude from our proxy materials for the 20182020 Annual Meeting.

Meeting any stockholder proposal not received by the deadline described above.

Other Stockholder Proposals for Presentation at the 20182020 Annual Meeting. A stockholder proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, but is instead intended to be presented at the 20182020 Annual Meeting, or thata stockholder who intends to submit a candidate for nomination as director at the 20182020 Annual Meeting, must comply with the “advance notice” deadlines in our Bylaws. As such, notice of such business or nominations must be received by the Company no earlier than October 30, 2017January 10, 2020 and no later than November 29, 2017February 9, 2020 as set forth more fully in the Company’s Bylaws, and must comply with the other requirements set forth in the Bylaws. Such notices must be in writing and received within the “advance notice” deadlines described above at the Company’s offices located at Ballston Tower, 671 North Glebe Road, 12th15th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203-2120, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

In accordance with its written charter as adopted by the Board, the Audit Committee of the Board assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of the quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, the Audit Committee met 13 times and discussed the interim financial information contained in each quarterly earnings announcement with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and independent auditors prior to public release. The members of the Audit Committee, along with other members of the Board, receive director education from its independent auditors at least once a year. The Audit Committee is entirely made up of independent directors as defined in applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules, as well as the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. These independent directors meet in executive session with the Company’s independent and internal auditors without management on at least a quarterly basis.

In discharging its oversight responsibility as to the audit process, the Audit Committee obtained from the independent auditors a formal written statement describing all relationships between the auditors and the Company that mightmay reasonably be thought to bear on the auditors’ independence consistent with applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), discussed with the auditors any relationships that may impact their objectivity and independence, including whether the independent auditors’ provision ofnon-audit services to the Company is compatible with the auditors’ independence, and satisfied itself as to the auditors’ independence. The Audit Committee also discussed with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors the quality and adequacy of the Company’s internal controls and the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget and staffing. The Audit Committee reviewed with both the independent and the internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope and identification of audit risks.

The Audit Committee discussed and reviewed with the independent auditors all communications required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and standards of the PCAOB, including those described in Auditing Standard No. 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees,” and, with and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of the independent auditors’ audit of the consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee also discussed the results of internal audit examinations.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, with management and the independent auditors. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the independent auditors have the responsibility for the audit of those statements.

Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in its 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee also recommended the reappointment, subject to stockholder ratification, of the independent auditors, and the Board concurred in such recommendation.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors:

Joseph L. Sclafani, Chair

Richard J. Carbone, Chair

Frederick W. KannerRobert J. Chersi

James Lam

Joseph L. Sclafani

Donna L. Weaver

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 11, 20179, 2019

The Notice of Internet Availability, the Proxy Statement and the Company’s 20162018 Annual Report are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM10-K

On February 22, 2017,20, 2019, the Company filed its Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162018, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form10-K/A filed on February 21, 2019, with the SEC. Stockholders may obtain a copy of the 20162018 Annual Report, as well as copies of this Proxy Statement and a proxy card, without charge on the Company’s website atabout.etrade.com, under the “Investor Relations” tab, by writing to the Corporate Secretary, at the Company’s offices located at Ballston Tower, 671 North Glebe Road, 12th15th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203-2120, emailing ir@etrade.com or calling us at(646) 521-4340.

OTHER MATTERS

Management does not know of any matters to be presented at this Annual Meeting other than those set forth herein and in the Notice accompanying this Proxy Statement.

LOGOLOGO

E*TRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

1271 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS11 TIMES SQUARE

14TH32ND FLOOR

NEW YORK, NY 1002010036

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 10, 2017.8, 2019. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

 

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically viae-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

 

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 10, 2017.8, 2019. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

 E21512-P88711E65282-P16792               KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

   DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

 E*TRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each of the following:   
 1. Election of Directors:    For      Against   Abstain
  1a. Richard J. Carbone   ☐  ☐
  1b. Robert J. Chersi ☐ ☐
1c.Jaime W. Ellertson ☐ ☐
1d.James P. Healy   ☐  ☐
  1c.1e. Kevin T. Kabat   ☐  ☐
  1d.Frederick W. Kanner ☐ ☐
1e.1f. James Lam   ☐  ☐
  1f.1g. Rodger A. Lawson   ☐  ☐
  1g.1h. Shelley B. Leibowitz   ☐  ☐
  1h.1i. Karl A. Roessner   ☐  ☐
  1i.1j. Rebecca Saeger   ☐  ☐
  1j.Joseph L. Sclafani ☐ ☐
1k. Gary H. SternDonna L. Weaver   ☐  ☐
  1l. Donna L. WeaverJoshua A. Weinreich   ☐  ☐

 

        

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:proposals:

  

For

  Against

  Abstain

  Against  Abstain

2.

 

To approve, by anon-binding advisory vote, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (the “Say-on-Pay“Say-on-Pay Vote”), as disclosed in the Proxy Statement for the 20172019 Annual Meeting.

       ☐

The Board of Directors recommends you vote for the selection of ONE YEAR on the following proposal:

   1 Year2 Years  3 Years  Abstain

3.

To select, by a non-binding advisory vote, the frequency of the Say-on-Pay Vote.

 ☐

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:

For  Against  Abstain

4.

 

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.2019.

       ☐

NOTE: In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.

  ☐
 

 

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

 

        

    

 

    

 

 

     Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

 

 

      Date

   

 

    

 

   Signature (Joint Owners)

 

 

      Date

 

V.1.1


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice, and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

 

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — —

E21513-P88711E65283-P16792          

 

 

E*TRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

May 11, 20179, 2019 8:30 AM Eastern

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

           

 

The undersigned hereby appoints Karl A. Roessner and Lori S. Sher, and each or any of them, as Proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as directed on the reverse side of this card, all of the shares of Common Stock of E*TRADE Financial Corporation, held of record by the undersigned on March 13, 2017,11, 2019, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of E*TRADE Financial Corporation to be held on May 11, 2017,9, 2019, or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.Ifthiscardisproperlyexecutedandreturnedandnosuchdirectionsaremade,thisproxywillbevotedasrecommendedbyourBoardofDirectors.

 

           
    

 

Address Changes/Comments:

 

 

 

    
   

 

                

    
    

 

                

    
 

 

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

 

Continued and to be signed on reverse side

 

 

V.1.1